Abstract:SUMMARY Naproxen 750 mg as a single dose followed by 250 mg three times daily has been compared with phenylbutazone 200 mg four times daily for 48 hours followed by 200 mg three times daily for the treatment of acute gout in an open study on 41 patients.The drugs were equally effective with few and relatively mild side effects. Naproxen is a useful alternative agent for the treatment of acute gout.
“…Few comparative studies of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs have been undertaken in acute gout, but indomethacin (Smyth & Percy, 1973), naproxen (Sturge et al, 1977) and feprazone (Reardon et al, 1980) appear to be of similar efficacy to phenylbutazone, with a mean interval of approximately 4 days between the onset of treatment and resolution of the attack: an interval similar to that seen in the present study. Fenoprofen (Weiner et al, 1979) and ketoprofen (Siegmeth & Placheta, 1976) were also considered to be of similar efficacy to phenylbutazone, but the data did not include the duration of attack following initiation treatment.…”
Flurbiprofen has been compared with phenylbutazone in a double-blind study involving 33 patients with acute gout. Patients received either flurbiprofen 400 mg daily for 48 h followed by 200 mg daily, or phenylbutazone 800 mg daily for 48 h followed by 400 mg daily. The drugs were of comparable efficacy, while side-effects were uncommon and relatively mild. Flurbiprofen appears to be a satisfactory alternative to phenylbutazone in the management of acute gouty arthritis.
“…Few comparative studies of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs have been undertaken in acute gout, but indomethacin (Smyth & Percy, 1973), naproxen (Sturge et al, 1977) and feprazone (Reardon et al, 1980) appear to be of similar efficacy to phenylbutazone, with a mean interval of approximately 4 days between the onset of treatment and resolution of the attack: an interval similar to that seen in the present study. Fenoprofen (Weiner et al, 1979) and ketoprofen (Siegmeth & Placheta, 1976) were also considered to be of similar efficacy to phenylbutazone, but the data did not include the duration of attack following initiation treatment.…”
Flurbiprofen has been compared with phenylbutazone in a double-blind study involving 33 patients with acute gout. Patients received either flurbiprofen 400 mg daily for 48 h followed by 200 mg daily, or phenylbutazone 800 mg daily for 48 h followed by 400 mg daily. The drugs were of comparable efficacy, while side-effects were uncommon and relatively mild. Flurbiprofen appears to be a satisfactory alternative to phenylbutazone in the management of acute gouty arthritis.
“…The FDA has approved naproxen (Evidence A) (33, 34), indomethacin (Evidence A) (26, 27, 31, 32), and sulindac (Evidence B) (35) for the treatment of acute gout. However, analgesic and anti-inflammatory doses of other NSAIDs may be as effective (Evidence B–C).…”
“…Although only a few open-label studies have reported quantitative results, nearly all have concluded clinical benefit associated with short-term NSAID therapy. Controlled studies have employed comparator groups that have included indomethacin [34][35][36][37], phenylbutazone [38][39][40][41][42][43], or a different dose of the study drug [44,45]. Although generally deemed beneficial with good tolerability, there have been no substantial differences between the study agents and comparator drugs.…”
Gout, a common form of inflammatory arthritis, has been markedly understudied relative to other rheumatologic conditions. As a result, evidence guiding clinical management in gout has traditionally been lacking. Burgeoning data suggests that quality of gout care in gout is frequently suboptimal. In this paper, we examine the evidence supporting gout management strategies in clinical practice. In addition, we examine consensus building efforts that have culminated in the recent publication of gout management quality indicators. We also discuss the need for future initiatives aimed at improving patient safety and quality of care in gout.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.