2016
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicentre safety of adding Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) to conventional ablation for atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the STAR AF II trial, the placement of linear lesions and the ablation of complex fractionated electrograms did not result in better outcome compared with PVI alone in patients with persistent AF [32], and these results have been corroborated by subsequent publications [33,34]. Rotor mapping and ablation is a safe technique [35], but evidence regarding the associated benefits is also contradictory [36,37]. Substrate-based ablation with targeted ablation of low-voltage areas in the left atrium by placement of strategic lesions in addition to PVI seems to be promising, resulting in higher success rates compared with conventional strategies, as recently shown in a randomised comparison of these two approaches [38,39].…”
Section: Choice Of the Appropriate Techniquementioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the STAR AF II trial, the placement of linear lesions and the ablation of complex fractionated electrograms did not result in better outcome compared with PVI alone in patients with persistent AF [32], and these results have been corroborated by subsequent publications [33,34]. Rotor mapping and ablation is a safe technique [35], but evidence regarding the associated benefits is also contradictory [36,37]. Substrate-based ablation with targeted ablation of low-voltage areas in the left atrium by placement of strategic lesions in addition to PVI seems to be promising, resulting in higher success rates compared with conventional strategies, as recently shown in a randomised comparison of these two approaches [38,39].…”
Section: Choice Of the Appropriate Techniquementioning
confidence: 82%
“…16 The fundamental mechanisms driving AF are still heavily debated by key opinion leaders because of the differences in pre-processing methods, analysis, and interpretation of fibrillation electrograms. 9,27 Currently proposed hypotheses are that AF is driven or sustained by focal activity emanating from varying locations throughout the atria; 9,28 spiral wave rotors that may change in complexity during the remodelling process 29,30 (also suggested by studies using ECG-imaging); 31 localized stable rotors [showed by using the Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) approach]; 32,33 multiple wavelets in the three-dimensional architecture of the atrial wall. 20,34 In the context of AF ablation beyond PVI, AF sources are particularly interesting when they are stationary or preferentially occur at specific sites.…”
Section: Potential Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous human in vivo research showed different strategies to locate AF drivers and guide pulmonary veins isolation (PVI). In the case of invasive mapping procedures (Narayan et al, 2012 ; Krummen et al, 2017 ; Navara et al, 2018 ), several catheters are introduced inside the atrial chambers to record from 8 to 128 simultaneous electrograms (EGM) (Narayan et al, 2012 ). Despite the number of intracardiac signals, the large distance between catheter sensors (up to 1–2 cm) and the complex atrial anatomy limits the capability of intracardiac mapping systems to characterize the global electrical activity in AF (Oesterlein et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%