2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicentre Evaluation of Hepika Test Clinical Accuracy in Diagnosing HPV-Induced Cancer and Precancerous Lesions of the Uterine Cervix

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of Hepika test to identify cancer/precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix. Materials and Methods: A multicentre retrospective study was carried out in 2018 and included 330 liquid-based cytology samples from three Italian centres of women aged 25–64 who had been tested for the human papillomavirus (HPV) and whose histology or follow-up outcome was known. Hepika is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) targeting the protein complexes E6#p53 and E7#pRb. Afte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding a p16/Ki67 dual-stain to screening has been reported to increase the detection rate of histological HSIL among hrHPV positive and cytology negative cases [ 35 ]. A positive Hepika test on a cytological sample seems to have a high sensitivity for invasive carcinoma, both squamous and glandular, in comparison to precursor lesions [ 36 ]. Since p16 and Hepika tests are both surrogate markers for hrHPV infection, adding them to the screening protocol in selected cases would probably increase the rate of, or at least provide an earlier detection for endocervical adenocarcinomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding a p16/Ki67 dual-stain to screening has been reported to increase the detection rate of histological HSIL among hrHPV positive and cytology negative cases [ 35 ]. A positive Hepika test on a cytological sample seems to have a high sensitivity for invasive carcinoma, both squamous and glandular, in comparison to precursor lesions [ 36 ]. Since p16 and Hepika tests are both surrogate markers for hrHPV infection, adding them to the screening protocol in selected cases would probably increase the rate of, or at least provide an earlier detection for endocervical adenocarcinomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to this research question, Gustinucci et al stated that in the diagnosis of gastric cancer, research on the characteristics and accuracy of multislice spiral CT and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging provides a more reliable basis for the evaluation of subsequent clinical manifestations [ 5 ]. Bartpho et al compared the value of multislice spiral CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer N staging [ 6 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%