2018
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter validation study for the certification of a CFTR gene scanning method using next generation sequencing technology

Abstract: The analytical sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates of the Multiplicom CFTR MASTR assay exceeded 99%. Because different types of CFTR mutations can be detected in a single workflow, the CFTR MASTR assay simplifies the overall process and is consequently well suited for routine diagnostics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, four of the eight patients that we diagnosed as CF-SPID at the newborn period who evolved into CFTR-RD (# 1, 3, 4, 6 in Table 5 ) also had a ST < 30 mmol/L, a single variant after first level analysis, among which the D1152H in four cases [ 22 ] and the second variant with undefined phenotypic consequences, i.e., Q1476X, L997F (2 cases) and S1426 F, were revealed by sequencing. Therefore, gene sequencing, which today can be performed with costs comparable to those of commercial panels of variants [ 10 ], significantly increases the number of CF-SPID diagnosed, and also other studies suggest performing extended gene analysis in subjects with CF-SPID [ 8 ]. Consequently, it allows start a follow-up of such subjects aimed to early reveal cases that may evolve into CF or CFTR-RD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, four of the eight patients that we diagnosed as CF-SPID at the newborn period who evolved into CFTR-RD (# 1, 3, 4, 6 in Table 5 ) also had a ST < 30 mmol/L, a single variant after first level analysis, among which the D1152H in four cases [ 22 ] and the second variant with undefined phenotypic consequences, i.e., Q1476X, L997F (2 cases) and S1426 F, were revealed by sequencing. Therefore, gene sequencing, which today can be performed with costs comparable to those of commercial panels of variants [ 10 ], significantly increases the number of CF-SPID diagnosed, and also other studies suggest performing extended gene analysis in subjects with CF-SPID [ 8 ]. Consequently, it allows start a follow-up of such subjects aimed to early reveal cases that may evolve into CF or CFTR-RD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFTR genotype was defined by the first level molecular analysis testing for 40 most frequent variants and for variants peculiar to Southern Italy. Thus, we performed the search for large gene deletions [ 9 ] and gene sequencing [ 10 ] in all cases that had: (i) a CFTR variant at the first level analysis; (ii) sweat chloride levels > 30 ng/mL. To define the effect of CFTR variants we referred to the CFTR 2 and to the French CFTR databases [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that traditional technologies did not enable prior detection of these variants. High-throughput NGS technologies have greatly improved the possibility of identifying rare CFTR variants, and of thus further elucidating the genetic heterogeneity of CF [9, 17, 23]. These approaches also dramatically increase the possibility of identifying novel and de novo variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all patients, the CFTR genotype was defined by screening a panel of the most frequent point mutations 42 and gene rearrangements 43 . Moreover, CFTR Sanger gene sequencing 44 or NGS 45 was performed when mutations were not detected in one or both alleles by first-level analysis. Furthermore, we analysed 7 intragenic CFTR short tandem repeats 46 to verify that both members of three sibling-pairs carrying only one known mutation had the same CFTR genotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%