2017
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Validation of an MMSE‐MoCA Conversion Table

Abstract: In this study, we validated a conversion table between MMSE and MoCA using a large multicenter sample. Our results suggest caution in interpreting the tables in heterogeneous clinical populations, as the MMSE-MoCA relationship may be different across dementia subtypes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
112
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
13
112
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In daily clinical practice, converting scores directly with the table derived from the log-linear smoothing method appears to be more convenient than using the regression equations, but the latter method can be used for more accurate conversion in settings where clinical calculators are available. As previously reported, 11 our data also revealed a prominent floor effect in the MoCA and the MoCA 5-min as score approached zero on the MoCA and the MoCA 5-min when MMSE score fell below 7 and 9, respectively ( Table 3). Given that the MoCA and the MoCA 5-min are designed for the detection of subtle decline at the higher end of the cognitive spectrum, these tests may not be suitable for measuring cognitive functions in patients with severe impairment, such as those with MMSE scores of 10 or below.…”
Section: Ies Accordingly Conversion Equations Based On Poisson Regrsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In daily clinical practice, converting scores directly with the table derived from the log-linear smoothing method appears to be more convenient than using the regression equations, but the latter method can be used for more accurate conversion in settings where clinical calculators are available. As previously reported, 11 our data also revealed a prominent floor effect in the MoCA and the MoCA 5-min as score approached zero on the MoCA and the MoCA 5-min when MMSE score fell below 7 and 9, respectively ( Table 3). Given that the MoCA and the MoCA 5-min are designed for the detection of subtle decline at the higher end of the cognitive spectrum, these tests may not be suitable for measuring cognitive functions in patients with severe impairment, such as those with MMSE scores of 10 or below.…”
Section: Ies Accordingly Conversion Equations Based On Poisson Regrsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Score conversion between the 2 tests has been reported previously in samples involving healthy controls, patients with MCI, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease, and cognitive impairment clinic samples ( Table 1). [9][10][11][12][13][14] However, such investigation has not been performed in patients with stroke or TIA. A major limitation in most score conversion studies is that in these studies MoCA scores were back equated to MMSE rather than vice versa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients and controls underwent a standardized medical and neurological evaluation including: neurological examination by an experienced movement disorders specialist, assessment of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) in a personal medical interview with questioning analogous to the REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Single-Question Screen, 6 7 Hence, a valid MoCA score was available for each subject. All clinical assessments were done before genetic analysis was performed.…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We divided the MoCA scores into three groups (MoCA score of 0~10, 11~17 and 18~30 points) [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%