2015
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.155366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Validation of a Shortened Gastric-Emptying Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delayed gastric emptying is one of the causes of FD. Gastric emptying can be measured by several kinds of methods, such as gastric emptying scintigraphy, barium-sandwich emptying radiography, gastric emptying ultrasound and 13 C-acetate breath test [5,6,7]. The 13 C-acetate breath test is widely used for the indirect assessment of gastric emptying [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delayed gastric emptying is one of the causes of FD. Gastric emptying can be measured by several kinds of methods, such as gastric emptying scintigraphy, barium-sandwich emptying radiography, gastric emptying ultrasound and 13 C-acetate breath test [5,6,7]. The 13 C-acetate breath test is widely used for the indirect assessment of gastric emptying [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scintigraphic quantification of gastric emptying is the most appropriate method for evaluating gastrointestinal motility-related diseases [ 21 , 26 ]. In this study, scintigraphy was used to measure first- and second-hour gastric emptying before and after IGB placement, according to the short validation protocol proposed by Pelletier et al [ 27 ], which promotes greater adherence and better acceptance by patients [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consensus protocol recommends imaging until up to 4 h for improved sensitivity in detecting delayed gastric emptying. The literature has suggested that retention of more than 10% of the meal at 4 h is abnormal and is the best discriminator between normal and abnormal results (4,16,17). Recently published articles suggest that a shortened protocol may be a satisfactory compromise (16), but consensus has not yet been established in the literature.…”
Section: Ges Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A final impediment may be the controversy in the recent literature suggesting that assessment of liquid emptying may be more important than previously realized, as well as controversy about the most expedient duration of imaging for GES (16,17). These unresolved issues may cause practitioners to question whether a protocol change is warranted (27).…”
Section: Guideline Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%