2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter retrospective comparison of spontaneous intestinal perforation outcomes between primary peritoneal drain and primary laparotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal surgical treatment of SIP is still controversial. Both randomized controlled trials ( 35 - 37 ) and observational studies ( 29 , 32 , 38 , 39 ) have demonstrated the type of initial operation has no impact on survival among preterm infants with intestinal perforation, similar to our findings. However, most studies mentioned above did not distinguish SIP from NEC and did not separately report the outcomes for SIP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal surgical treatment of SIP is still controversial. Both randomized controlled trials ( 35 - 37 ) and observational studies ( 29 , 32 , 38 , 39 ) have demonstrated the type of initial operation has no impact on survival among preterm infants with intestinal perforation, similar to our findings. However, most studies mentioned above did not distinguish SIP from NEC and did not separately report the outcomes for SIP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Among VPIs with SIP who received surgery, more than half received laparotomy only and about three quarters of infants initially treated with peritoneal drainage received secondary laparotomy, indicating that laparotomy was the most commonly used surgical intervention for SIP in China. In the literature, however, peritoneal drainage was performed in the majority (64.3–89.3%) of SIP infants with a varied proportion (24.1–68.8%) of infants subsequently requiring laparotomy ( 29 - 34 ). Considering that peritoneal drainage is allowed to be performed at the bedside and avoids surgical complications, it is generally conducted as an alternative treatment for SIP, temporarily or definitively, especially in infants who are too unstable to tolerate laparotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not statistically significant, peritoneal drainage was employed more frequently in PT patients (22.4%) than in the TC group (4.4%). This likely reflects a practice pattern at our institution where patients are approached differently based on their gestational age and weight at the time of diagnosis, which is similar to the strategy utilized at other centers (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The diagnosis typically occurs in the first week of life when affected infants present with abdominal distension, with or without clinical instability, and free air in the abdomen (pneumoperitoneum) evident on radiographs ( 12 ). The current standard of care is surgical intervention (drain into abdomen or resection of compromised tissue), cessation of enteral nutrition, and a course of antibiotics ( 13 , 14 ). This is the same treatment utilized when there is an intestinal perforation in NEC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%