2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5842-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter, randomized single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (SIMPLE) trial in colon cancer: an interim analysis

Abstract: The results of this interim analysis suggested that SPLS is technically safe and appropriate when used for radical resection of colon cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01480128).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data for patients receiving conventional perioperative care was extracted from the SIMPLE (multicenter, randomized si ngle-port versus multi-port l aparoscopic surg e ry) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01480128) at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital and Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital from patients who received surgery between August 2011 and February 2017. The SIMPLE trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving seven hospitals in Korea designed to test the hypothesis that the short-term outcome of single-port laparoscopic surgery was non-inferior to that of multi-port laparoscopic surgery in colon cancer 6 . Accordingly, patients were randomized to receive single-port or multi-port surgery, and all received conventional perioperative care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for patients receiving conventional perioperative care was extracted from the SIMPLE (multicenter, randomized si ngle-port versus multi-port l aparoscopic surg e ry) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01480128) at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital and Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital from patients who received surgery between August 2011 and February 2017. The SIMPLE trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving seven hospitals in Korea designed to test the hypothesis that the short-term outcome of single-port laparoscopic surgery was non-inferior to that of multi-port laparoscopic surgery in colon cancer 6 . Accordingly, patients were randomized to receive single-port or multi-port surgery, and all received conventional perioperative care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All surgeries were performed at the three tertiary-referral hospitals where more than 100 colorectal cancer patients are treated annually by seven independent surgeons. These surgeons were qualified through live demonstrations held by the Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group, and each submitted a videotape of their laparoscopic rectal surgery, which was subsequently reviewed by a trial steering committee to assess the surgeon's oncological technique [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All surgeries were performed at the three tertiary-referral hospitals where more than 100 colorectal cancer patients are treated annually by seven independent surgeons. These surgeons were quali ed through live demonstrations held by the Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group and each submitted a videotape of their laparoscopic rectal surgery, which was subsequently reviewed by a trial steering committee to assess the surgeon's oncological technique [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%