2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in keeping with those of some previous studies, such as a publication by Kinsella et al[32] demonstrating decreased need for ECMO in these patients and the previously mentioned trial by Bronicki et al[30], which found decreased ECMO usage, as well as increased ventilator free days for the iNO arm. Lower usage of HFOV may be an additional mechanism for the observed decrease in duration of mechanical ventilation, as HFOV is associated with increased ventilator days[33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in keeping with those of some previous studies, such as a publication by Kinsella et al[32] demonstrating decreased need for ECMO in these patients and the previously mentioned trial by Bronicki et al[30], which found decreased ECMO usage, as well as increased ventilator free days for the iNO arm. Lower usage of HFOV may be an additional mechanism for the observed decrease in duration of mechanical ventilation, as HFOV is associated with increased ventilator days[33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our mortality results agree with those of previous studies[4-10], though it has been argued that mortality in PARDS is usually secondary to non-pulmonary causes, making it unsurprising that improved oxygenation would have little effect on overall mortality[28]. However, previous studies did not evaluate for morbidity effects and selectively excluded certain populations of patients—such as those with immunocompromise, sepsis, and multisystem organ dysfunction—from analysis, which limits generalizability of the results to a significant portion of PICU patients[29, 30]. The largest study of iNO in PARDS to date propensity matched 521 PARDS patients who received iNO to those who did not, and found no improvement in mortality or ventilator free days[11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This iNO usage practice is supported by clinical trials showing increased oxygenation without a reduction in mortality in premature babies with HRF. 16 This study safely reduced iNO usage rates with no adverse effects from iNO therapy observed in the preterm infant cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Multiple studies of iNO in adult ARDS have not shown benefit on mortality or liberation from mechanical ventilation. However, a recent study by Bronicki et al showed a decreased duration of mechanical ventilation and an increased rate of ECMO-free survival in PARDS patients who were randomized to receiving iNO (6). As a follow-up, put these results in the context of how PARDS pathophysiology differs from that of adults and also address the PALICC recommendation against the routine use of iNO in PARDS in the context of more targeted use through PARDS patient subclass stratification.…”
Section: Pards Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%