2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00197.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter performance evaluation of a transcription‐mediated amplification assay for screening of human immunodeficiency virus‐1 RNA, hepatitis C virus RNA, and hepatitis B virus DNA in blood donations

Abstract: The performance characteristics of Procleix Ultrio assay and the Procleix HIV-1 and HCV assay are comparable. The sensitivity for HIV-1 and HCV met the directives of the Paul-Ehrlich Institute and the FDA. The assay can reduce the WP for HBV by 6 days to 2 weeks when used in small MP (<1:8) or single-donation screening protocols.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
62
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(31 reference statements)
10
62
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Plasma samples from 250,191 individual donations were tested by Ultrio TMA HIV1/HCV/HBV assay (Chiron, Emeryville, CA) in single-donation format able to detect 11 (7.3-22) IU/mL at the 95% limit. 6 Reactive donations were retested by discriminatory assays for HCV RNA, HBV DNA, and HIV RNA. Donations reactive with HBV discriminatory assay were considered positive for HBV DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Plasma samples from 250,191 individual donations were tested by Ultrio TMA HIV1/HCV/HBV assay (Chiron, Emeryville, CA) in single-donation format able to detect 11 (7.3-22) IU/mL at the 95% limit. 6 Reactive donations were retested by discriminatory assays for HCV RNA, HBV DNA, and HIV RNA. Donations reactive with HBV discriminatory assay were considered positive for HBV DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, discriminatory testing, which delayed the result by about 4 h, was required only in a single blood donor with an initially false-reactive result. This excellent specificity after the initial test run (99.99%) was slightly better than reported for the older Ultrio assay (99.83%) with semi-automated handling [13] and for the Ultrio Elite assay (99.95%) in a multicenter study [14]. Excellent results on specificity and robustness as well as the short turnaround time of the Procleix Ultrio Elite assay / Panther system suggested that ID-NAT seems to be feasible in the future also for granulocyte donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…HCV araştırmasın-da kullanılan kitlerin paraproteinemi, üremi, RF pozitifliği gibi durumlarda yalancı pozitifliği de söz konusudur (35) . HCV antijen testi ve NAT kullanımı ile kan güvenliğinin arttırılması sağlanabilir (20,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)36) . Amerika Birleşik Devletlerinde NAT kullanımı sonrası kan ve bileşenleri ile HCV bulaş riski 1:1,935,000 ünite olarak hesaplanmaktadır (21) .…”
Section: Hepatit C Virüsü (Hcv)unclassified
“…NAT sistemlerin etkinliğinin araştırıldığı çok sayıda karşı-laştırmalı çalışma mevcuttur. NAT'ın transfüzyon bulaş riskini azalttığını, ancak sıfırlayamadığını da belirtmek gerekir (20,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified