Abstract:Continued waves, new variants, and limited vaccine deployment mean that SARS-CoV-2 tests remain vital to constrain the COVID-19 pandemic. Affordable, point-of-care (PoC) tests allow rapid screening in non-medical settings. Reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is an appealing approach. A crucial step is to optimize testing in low/medium resource settings. Here, we optimized RT-LAMP for SARS-CoV-2 and human β actin, and tested clinical samples in multiple countries. TTTT linker … Show more
“…The effect of guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) on the performance of E-ID1 primer set in both colorimetric and fluorometric RT-LAMP reactions was tested since it was reported to enhance the detection speed and efficiency (Dudley et al, 2020, Lu et al, 2022, Zhang, 2020b). Figure 3 (a) shows two sets of colorimetric RT-LAMP with and without the addition of GuHCl (40 mM) on positive clinical specimens, in addition to PC and NTC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement was evident with final concentrations between 40-60 mM in a 25 µL reaction volume, with 40 mM being the optimum recommended concentration <https://international.neb.com>\(Zhang et al, 2020b). Most studies reported this enhancement from GuHCl on RNA-extracted clinical samples but not in direct ones (Dudley et al, 2020, Lu et al, 2022). Based on that, we used 40 mM GuHCl in the colorimetric and fluorometric RT-…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To address this issue, we hypothesize that a lower number of LAMP primers will reduce the false positivity rate, which is the most common limitation of the LAMP technique (Meagher et al, 2018, Odiwuor et al, 2022). The slower amplification rate can be improved by optimizing the performance of the developed colorimetric and fluorometric assays via increasing the enzyme’s concentration or adding primer binding enhancers like guanidine hydrochloride, as shown elsewhere (Dudley et al, 2020, Lu et al, 2022, Zhang, 2020b). In this work, we demonstrate the efficiency of using five primers to reduce misamplifications by comparing them with five primer sets targeting different genes such as RdRP, S , and N .…”
The reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is a cheaper and faster testing alternative for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, high false-positive rate due to misamplification is one of the major limitations. To overcome misamplifications, we developed colorimetric and fluorometric RT-LAMP assays. The assay performances was verified by the gold-standard RT-qPCR technique on 150 clinical samples. Compared to other primer sets with six primers (N, S, andRdRp), E-ID1 primer set, including five primers, performed superbly on both colorimetric and fluorometric assays, yielding sensitivities of 89.5% and 100%, respectively, with a limit of detection of 20 copies/µL. The colorimetric RT-LAMP had a specificity of 97.2% and an accuracy of 94.5%, while the fluorometric RT-LAMP obtained 96.9% and 98%, respectively. No misamplification was evident even after 120 minutes, which is crucial for the success of this technique. These findings are important to support the use of RT-LAMP in the healthcare systems in fighting COVID-19.
“…The effect of guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) on the performance of E-ID1 primer set in both colorimetric and fluorometric RT-LAMP reactions was tested since it was reported to enhance the detection speed and efficiency (Dudley et al, 2020, Lu et al, 2022, Zhang, 2020b). Figure 3 (a) shows two sets of colorimetric RT-LAMP with and without the addition of GuHCl (40 mM) on positive clinical specimens, in addition to PC and NTC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement was evident with final concentrations between 40-60 mM in a 25 µL reaction volume, with 40 mM being the optimum recommended concentration <https://international.neb.com>\(Zhang et al, 2020b). Most studies reported this enhancement from GuHCl on RNA-extracted clinical samples but not in direct ones (Dudley et al, 2020, Lu et al, 2022). Based on that, we used 40 mM GuHCl in the colorimetric and fluorometric RT-…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To address this issue, we hypothesize that a lower number of LAMP primers will reduce the false positivity rate, which is the most common limitation of the LAMP technique (Meagher et al, 2018, Odiwuor et al, 2022). The slower amplification rate can be improved by optimizing the performance of the developed colorimetric and fluorometric assays via increasing the enzyme’s concentration or adding primer binding enhancers like guanidine hydrochloride, as shown elsewhere (Dudley et al, 2020, Lu et al, 2022, Zhang, 2020b). In this work, we demonstrate the efficiency of using five primers to reduce misamplifications by comparing them with five primer sets targeting different genes such as RdRP, S , and N .…”
The reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is a cheaper and faster testing alternative for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, high false-positive rate due to misamplification is one of the major limitations. To overcome misamplifications, we developed colorimetric and fluorometric RT-LAMP assays. The assay performances was verified by the gold-standard RT-qPCR technique on 150 clinical samples. Compared to other primer sets with six primers (N, S, andRdRp), E-ID1 primer set, including five primers, performed superbly on both colorimetric and fluorometric assays, yielding sensitivities of 89.5% and 100%, respectively, with a limit of detection of 20 copies/µL. The colorimetric RT-LAMP had a specificity of 97.2% and an accuracy of 94.5%, while the fluorometric RT-LAMP obtained 96.9% and 98%, respectively. No misamplification was evident even after 120 minutes, which is crucial for the success of this technique. These findings are important to support the use of RT-LAMP in the healthcare systems in fighting COVID-19.
“…(20,27,38–44). These publications describe many different primer sets and use patient samples without purification (“direct assays”) (some are summarized here: (42)) or with prior purification of RNA, many with optimized procedures where compelling data could be obtained that suggest suitable sensitivity of RT-LAMP for detection of infections in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. Yet, intrinsic limitations of simple RT-LAMP assays using colorimetric readouts without sequence-specific probes such as molecular beacons, complicate its practical implementation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the onset of the pandemic, a large number of publications emerged describing the use and validation of RT-LAMP assays for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, i.e. (20,27,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). These publications describe many different primer sets and use patient samples without purification ("direct assays") (some are summarized here: (42)) or with prior purification of RNA, many with optimized procedures where compelling data could be obtained that suggest suitable sensitivity of RT-LAMP for detection of infections in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.…”
Section: Implementation Of a Large-scale Rt-lamp-based Sars-cov-2 Tes...mentioning
Throughout the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, limited diagnostic testing capacity prevented sentinel testing of the population, demonstrating the need for novel testing strategies and infrastructures. Here, we describe the set-up of an alternative testing platform, which allows scalable surveillance testing as an acute pandemic response tool and for pandemic preparedness purposes, exemplified by SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics in an academic environment. The testing strategy involves self-sampling based on gargling saline, pseudonymized sample handling, automated 96-well plate-based RNA extraction, and viral RNA detection using a semi-quantitative multiplexed colorimetric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay with an analytical sensitivity comparable to RT-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). We provide standard operating procedures and an integrated software solution for all workflows, including sample logistics, LAMP assay analysis by colorimetry or by sequencing (LAMP-seq), and communication of results to participants and the health authorities. Using large sample sets including longitudinal sample series we evaluated factors affecting the viral load and the stability of gargling samples as well as the diagnostic sensitivity of the RT-LAMP assay. We performed >35,000 tests during the pandemic, with an average turnover time of fewer than 6 hours from sample arrival at the test station to result announcement. Altogether, our work provides a blueprint for fast, sensitive, scalable, cost- and labor-efficient RT-LAMP diagnostics. As RT-LAMP-based testing requires advanced, but non-specialized laboratory equipment, it is independent of potentially limiting clinical diagnostics supply chains.
Since the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in the world, many countries have searched for quick diagnostic tools to detect the virus. There are many ways to design diagnostic assays; however, each may have its limitations. A quick, sensitive, specific, and simple approach is essential for highly rapidly transmitted infections, such as SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to develop a rapid and cost-effective diagnostic tool using a one-step Reverse Transcriptase Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) approach. The results were observed using the naked eye within 30–60 min using turbidity or colorimetric analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and lowest limit of detection (LoD) for SARS-CoV-2 RNA against the RT-LAMP assay were assessed. This assay was also verified and validated against commercial quantitative RT-PCR used by health authorities in Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, a quick and direct sampling from the saliva, or buccal cavity, was applied after simple modification, using proteinase K and heating at 98 °C for 5 min to avoid routine RNA extraction. This rapid single-tube diagnostic tool detected COVID-19 with an accuracy rate of 95% for both genes (
ORF1a
and
N
) and an LoD for the
ORF1a
and
N
genes as 39 and 25 copies/reaction, respectively. It can be potentially used as a high-throughput national screening for different respiratory-based infections within the Middle East region, such as the MERS virus or major zoonotic pathogens such as
Mycobacterium paratuberculosis
and
Brucella
spp., particularly in remote and rural areas where lab equipment is limited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.