2013
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter evaluation of a standardized protocol for noninvasive gene expression profiling

Abstract: Gene expression profiling of transplant recipient blood and urine can potentially be used to monitor graft function, but the multitude of protocols in use make sharing data and comparing results from different laboratories difficult. The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of current methods of RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and to test whether multiple centers using a standardized protocol can obtain the same results. Samples, reagents, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several reports on assessing mRNA level in urine sediments (12,37,38), urine protein (13,35) and peptides (16) have highlighted the feasibility of identifying potential biomarker molecules in urine. Measurement of urine mRNA levels presents an attractive biomarker option, but susceptibility of mRNA in the urine in combination with low mRNA abundances requires more validation in the clinical setting (39). Unlike peak clustering for SELDI-TOF or a label-free shotgun MS/MS approach, the quantitative iTRAQ method provides an accurate assessment of protein levels in the urine samples analyzed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports on assessing mRNA level in urine sediments (12,37,38), urine protein (13,35) and peptides (16) have highlighted the feasibility of identifying potential biomarker molecules in urine. Measurement of urine mRNA levels presents an attractive biomarker option, but susceptibility of mRNA in the urine in combination with low mRNA abundances requires more validation in the clinical setting (39). Unlike peak clustering for SELDI-TOF or a label-free shotgun MS/MS approach, the quantitative iTRAQ method provides an accurate assessment of protein levels in the urine samples analyzed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the multi-center CTOT-04 trial has not only validated the accuracy of urinary cell mRNA profiling for the detection of ACR in single center studies but also the utility of urinary cell mRNA profiles for the prediction of future occurrence of an ACR. It is also noteworthy that the reproducibility of the urinary cell mRNA protocols across laboratories has been examined and the overall, gene expression measurements had a correlation greater than 0.938 for the samples in this independent study [96]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its members have published standardized protocols to perform ELISPOT analyses of IFN-g generation by activated T cells, 12 gene expression profiling, 104 and multiplex analysis of HLA antibodies. 118 As mentioned above, the European ONE study consortium (http://www.onestudy.org/) has launched a standardization project of whole blood immune phenotype monitoring for clinical trials based on flow cytometry.…”
Section: Analytical Methods Harmonization and Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 99%