1990
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199002000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter evaluation of a new recombinant enzyme immunoassay for the combined detection of antibody to HIV-1 and HIV-2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HIV-2 has been found predominantly in West Africa and to a lesser extent in Portugal and France. Despite its rare occurrence in the United States, serological screening for HIV-2, in addition to serological screening for HIV-1, has been implemented in an effort to increase the safety of blood and blood products (5). Similarly, once the RNA assays are implemented, the requirement to test for both HIV-1 and HIV-2 RNAs could be imminent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HIV-2 has been found predominantly in West Africa and to a lesser extent in Portugal and France. Despite its rare occurrence in the United States, serological screening for HIV-2, in addition to serological screening for HIV-1, has been implemented in an effort to increase the safety of blood and blood products (5). Similarly, once the RNA assays are implemented, the requirement to test for both HIV-1 and HIV-2 RNAs could be imminent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first serological assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV-1) was implemented in 1985, 3 years after the recognition of HIV as the causative agent of AIDS (6,17,33). In 1986, a second HIV type, HIV-2, was isolated from patients with AIDS in West Africa (11), which led to the implementation of simultaneous screening for HIV-1 and HIV-2 (5,41). In the following years, continuous improvements of the serological assays, along with donor education and deferral procedures, have greatly reduced the risks of transfusion-acquired HIV infection (16,25,39,46).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The desire to narrow this infectious window has led to consideration of adding to blood and organ donor-screening programs assays for direct detection of viral p24 antigen or nucleic acids (DNA and RNA).15. '7*' [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Understanding of the duration of the antibody-negative window period, and of the relative sensitivities of antibody and direct viral assays for detection of evolving primary HIV-1 infections, is limited by a lack of optimally collected specimens with which to characterize this dynamic phase of infection. Analyses of serial samples from paid plasmapheresis donors who were later determined to have seroconverted have proven very useful for developing improved serologic assays and documenting their enhanced sen~itivity.~-~ However, because cryopreserved white cells were not available from these donors, these seroconversion panels have not allowed assessment of HIV-1 DNA detection techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infectious window period defines the time during which an individual is both infected and infectious prior to seroconversion. While the sensitivities of HIV antibody detection assays have significantly improved since the tests were first licensed in 1985 (2,4,5,10,28), the infectious window period is still longer for the assays based on the detection of anti-HIV antibodies than for the assays based on the detection of viral nucleic acids. Indeed, the assays based on the detection of HIV-1 RNA by PCR gave positive results 7 to 11 days before the assays based on the detection of anti-HIV antibodies (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%