2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0493-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter dataset of multi-shell diffusion MRI in healthy traveling adults with identical settings

Abstract: Multicenter diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has drawn great attention recently due to the expanding need for large-scale brain imaging studies, whereas the variability in MRI scanners and data acquisition tends to confound reliable individual-based analysis of diffusion measures. In addition, a growing number of multi-shell diffusion models have been shown with the potential to generate various estimates of physio-pathological information, yet their reliability and reproducibility in multicenter stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach requires the images from the same participants at all the participating sites, but also requires significant effort from the sites and the participants when compared to other harmonization methods listed above, and the TS scans must be completed before the analysis starts. However, the TS approach can differentiate most of the sample variability from measurement bias in functional MRI ( Yamashita et al, 2019 ), structure and diffusion MRI ( Tong et al, 2020 ). In our prior study, by scanning nine TS participants repeatedly at all the twelve sites, Yamashita et al achieved the high-quality harmonization of the functional connectivity obtained by functional MRI ( Yamashita et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Previous Neuroimaging Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach requires the images from the same participants at all the participating sites, but also requires significant effort from the sites and the participants when compared to other harmonization methods listed above, and the TS scans must be completed before the analysis starts. However, the TS approach can differentiate most of the sample variability from measurement bias in functional MRI ( Yamashita et al, 2019 ), structure and diffusion MRI ( Tong et al, 2020 ). In our prior study, by scanning nine TS participants repeatedly at all the twelve sites, Yamashita et al achieved the high-quality harmonization of the functional connectivity obtained by functional MRI ( Yamashita et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Previous Neuroimaging Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We deliberately kept some cohorts overlapping completely in age, while others were non-overlapping. To show that our model generalizes to unseen images, we also applied the trained harmonization model to one travelling subject collected in (Tong et al, 2020), who was scanned 12 times at 10 different sites within 13 months. This traveling subject was also used to validate the harmonization quantitatively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these situations, the demographic and clinical conditions need to be strictly controlled and matched. Furthermore, even with the data collected from the same scanners/sites, the images collected may also show slight variance (Tong et al, 2020). These intra-site differences make the harmonization less accurate due to the lack of diversity of these domain-based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach requires the images from the same participants at all the participating sites, but also requires significant effort from the sites and the participants when compared to other harmonization methods listed above, and the TS scans must be completed before the analysis starts. However, the TS approach can differentiate most of the sample variability from measurement bias in functional MRI (Yamashita et al, 2019), structure and diffusion MRI (Tong et al, 2020). The DecNef Project explored rsfMRI functional connectivity for multiple psychiatric diseases and scanned nine TS participants who received repeated MRI measurements at all sites.…”
Section: Traveling Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%