2003
DOI: 10.1197/aemj.10.5.476-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Comparison of the Predictive Value of the Revised Trauma Score and the Glasgow Coma Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, one study of a small Canadian population of 912 patients found that whereas V and M were the best predictors of mortality, E was the best predictor of the Functional Independence Measure, M and E were the best predictors of the Glasgow Outcome Scale and V and M were the best predictors of intensive care unit admission. 20 Finally, dropping V and E does not solve the problem of patients under the effect of medication, drugs or alcohol, for whom all three components of the GCS are affected or spinal cord-injured patients for whom the motor component is unjust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, one study of a small Canadian population of 912 patients found that whereas V and M were the best predictors of mortality, E was the best predictor of the Functional Independence Measure, M and E were the best predictors of the Glasgow Outcome Scale and V and M were the best predictors of intensive care unit admission. 20 Finally, dropping V and E does not solve the problem of patients under the effect of medication, drugs or alcohol, for whom all three components of the GCS are affected or spinal cord-injured patients for whom the motor component is unjust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%