Seventh International Conference on Networking (Icn 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icn.2008.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicast Voice Transmission over Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: Issues and Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between [14] and our work are twofold. First, [14] uses the UDP/IP protocol suite and the IEEE 802.11b radios to transmit and receive data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The differences between [14] and our work are twofold. First, [14] uses the UDP/IP protocol suite and the IEEE 802.11b radios to transmit and receive data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The differences between [14] and our work are twofold. First, [14] uses the UDP/IP protocol suite and the IEEE 802.11b radios to transmit and receive data. In contrast, in this paper we used the Wave Short Message Protocol (WSMP) to transmit/receive data, which is officially defined in the IEEE 1609.3 specification [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason behind this process is that realtime applications are susceptible to QoS degradation due to increasing packet loss ratios that are caused by handover 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 delays. Moderate wireless channel ′ s data rates are suitable for voice and low quality video applications [21]. Hence, in the proposed INS scheme when a current session is a real-time application (VoIP or Video), the current residual channel capacity (CR c ) for the current network connection (Cnet) was compared to the app c i of current application i .…”
Section: Lookup Table Of Minimum Required Channel Capacity For Real-tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, even at fast car speeds (up to 65 mph) it is possible [25] to achieve a 1 Mbps data rate with an IEEE 802.11b system operating with a range of 250 m. Guo et al [11] modeled multiple video sources traveling on a 4-5 lane highway in Atlanta. Video was collected by sending from a car approaching a destination a request trigger to a camera on a remote vehicle passing a destination region.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%