2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiblock copolymers based on poly(p-phenylene)-co-poly(arylene ether sulfone ketone) with sulfonated multiphenyl pendant groups for polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEMFC) application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, low current density range) as reported by others. , However, the MEA with CM-50 shows larger cell voltages from the current density ranges of 0.6 to 1.8 A cm –2 due to the larger proton conductivity of CM-50, resulting in lowering the membrane resistance under the MEA operation. Furthermore, since Nafion 212 could be highly influenced by the mass transfer limitations in the high current density ranges above 0.8 A cm –2 , a drastic decrease in cell voltage values of Nafion 212 was observed as reported before. ,, Therefore, a larger maximum power density value of the MEA employing CM-50 (0.70 W cm –2 ) than that employing Nafion 212 (0.58 W cm –2 ) can be obtained from our preliminary MEA performance test. The cell performance of the MEA employing CM-50 was found to be better than and/or comparable to those employing SHPs reported before, as shown in Table S4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, low current density range) as reported by others. , However, the MEA with CM-50 shows larger cell voltages from the current density ranges of 0.6 to 1.8 A cm –2 due to the larger proton conductivity of CM-50, resulting in lowering the membrane resistance under the MEA operation. Furthermore, since Nafion 212 could be highly influenced by the mass transfer limitations in the high current density ranges above 0.8 A cm –2 , a drastic decrease in cell voltage values of Nafion 212 was observed as reported before. ,, Therefore, a larger maximum power density value of the MEA employing CM-50 (0.70 W cm –2 ) than that employing Nafion 212 (0.58 W cm –2 ) can be obtained from our preliminary MEA performance test. The cell performance of the MEA employing CM-50 was found to be better than and/or comparable to those employing SHPs reported before, as shown in Table S4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Furthermore, since Nafion 212 could be highly influenced by the mass transfer limitations in the high current density ranges above 0.8 A cm −2 , a drastic decrease in cell voltage values of Nafion 212 was observed as reported before. 15,46,57 Therefore, a larger maximum power density value of the MEA employing CM-50 (0.70 W cm −2 ) than that employing Nafion 212 (0.58 W cm −2 ) can be obtained from our preliminary MEA performance test. The cell performance of the MEA employing CM-50 was found to be better than and/or comparable to those employing SHPs reported before, as shown in Table S4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, the available H + and Fe 2+ cations also cross the membrane from feed side to dialysate side in order to meet the electrically neutral requirements. H + ions are transported much more extensively compared to Fe 2+ ion due to their small size and lower valence state [56,57].…”
Section: Acid Recovery Performance Of Qdab Aems Via Diffusion Dialysis (Dd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few decades, hydrocarbon-based ionomers have been regarded as the most promising alternatives to Nafion because of their high ionic conductivity, low vanadium permeability, and low cost, even though their chemical stability issue is still unresolved. , Considering that IEM is exposed to extremely harsh conditions in a VRFB single cell, the chemical stability of IEM materials has been regarded as an overarching property. In accordance with the impressive studies of many passionate researchers, the electrophilic attack of active radicals on the electron abundant moieties is the main cause of chemical degradation of hydrocarbon-based ionomers. That is, the chemical stability of flexible hydrophilic moieties or blocks with ether or sulfide bonds significantly affects the chemical degradation of IEM materials. Therefore, various research groups have investigated hydrocarbon-based ionomers with rigid hydrophilic blocks such as sulfonated poly­( p -phenylene)­s and sulfonated poly­(arylene sulfone)­s, which have led to considerable progress in the domain of hydrocarbon-based ionomers for VRFBs. Nevertheless, hydrocarbon-based ionomers are limited by their insufficient chemical stability, which suggests that there is likely another issue that affects the chemical stability of ionomers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%