2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multibiomarker approach to assess the magnitude of occupational exposure and effects induced by a mixture of metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific threshold values that distinguish NM-exposed populations and normal controls (or pre- and post-exposure) and predict the poor outcomes remain unclear for these biomarkers [ 78 , 81 ]. Which one (or which combination) [ 82 ] is the optimal biomarker remains under-investigated. These two issues need to be resolved by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate regression analysis [ 78 , 79 , 81 , 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specific threshold values that distinguish NM-exposed populations and normal controls (or pre- and post-exposure) and predict the poor outcomes remain unclear for these biomarkers [ 78 , 81 ]. Which one (or which combination) [ 82 ] is the optimal biomarker remains under-investigated. These two issues need to be resolved by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate regression analysis [ 78 , 79 , 81 , 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which one (or which combination) [ 82 ] is the optimal biomarker remains under-investigated. These two issues need to be resolved by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and multivariate regression analysis [ 78 , 79 , 81 , 82 ]. The reference ranges of significant oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers we identified also should be calculated to better explain the biomarker roles of them in different disease settings [ 74 , 75 , 83 , 84 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%