2003
DOI: 10.1080/00218460309571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiaxial, temperature, and time-dependent (matt) failure model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Richardson et al [16] proposed and evaluated a multiaxial, time and temperature (MATT) model for an epoxy adhesive, which is based on an ellipsoidal failure envelope and is fairly accurate for temperatures between −29 • C and 46 • C for a wide range of normal and shear load combinations provided that the assembly is loaded at a constant rate. Park and Liechti [17] performed tensile and shear experiments on a urethane structural adhesive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Richardson et al [16] proposed and evaluated a multiaxial, time and temperature (MATT) model for an epoxy adhesive, which is based on an ellipsoidal failure envelope and is fairly accurate for temperatures between −29 • C and 46 • C for a wide range of normal and shear load combinations provided that the assembly is loaded at a constant rate. Park and Liechti [17] performed tensile and shear experiments on a urethane structural adhesive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, most studies have considered separately the influences of temperature and strain rate on the adhesive behaviour, while only a few have concerned with the combined effect of temperature and strain rate [16,17]. For example, Richardson et al [16] proposed and evaluated a multiaxial, time and temperature (MATT) model for an epoxy adhesive, which is based on an ellipsoidal failure envelope and is fairly accurate for temperatures between −29 • C and 46 • C for a wide range of normal and shear load combinations provided that the assembly is loaded at a constant rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of deformation, and stress=strain history. The most complete studies were conducted by ATK Thiokol for development of the multiaxial, temperature, and time-dependent (MATT) failure model [18]. The failure model stands independently from the constitutive framework required to calculate stresses within a component.…”
Section: Figure 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are a quadratic stress criterion (Brewer and Lagace, 1988) and other failure criteria based on the first invariant of the stress tensor and the second invariant of the deviatoric stress tensor (Dolev and Ishai, 1981, Adams et al, 1986, Richardson et al, 2003, Mahnken and Schlimmer, 2005. However, most of these criteria have unknown parameters that depend on the material properties of adhesives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A uniform shear stress state is generated in the adhesive layer of the ring specimen subjected to torsion. That is to say, a tensile/torque test method with a napkin-ring specimen has been developed so that the parameters of the failure criterion for multiaxial stress states can be calculated from experimental results to tune the ratio of applied tension and torque (Richardson et al, 2003, Mahnken and Schlimmer, 2005, Spaggiari, et al, 2013, Teutenberg, et al, 2013. Although this method can evaluate a failure criterion without a free-edge effect, a highly accurate biaxial testing machine, which few research institutions might possess, is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%