2001
DOI: 10.1080/10255840108908009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiaxial Mechanical Behavior of Human Saccular Aneurysms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average wall thickness of cerebral aneurysms measured in [2,21] are 0.11 and 0.086 mm, respectively. Cerebral aneurysms exhibit a nonlinear response over finite strains that is typical for soft biological tissues [21]; however, for pressure of 100 mmHg the aneurysm wall stretch ratio is only around 1.05 [21].…”
Section: Governing Equations For Fsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average wall thickness of cerebral aneurysms measured in [2,21] are 0.11 and 0.086 mm, respectively. Cerebral aneurysms exhibit a nonlinear response over finite strains that is typical for soft biological tissues [21]; however, for pressure of 100 mmHg the aneurysm wall stretch ratio is only around 1.05 [21].…”
Section: Governing Equations For Fsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the diameter of ICAs can exceed 30 mm, the wall thickness ranges from 16 to 500 µm (Humphrey and Canham 2000;Seshaiyer et al 2001). Mechanical tests indicated that the wall tissue has negligible bending stiffness (Humphrey and Canham 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, one of the potentially most important applications of this method would be to characterize evolving properties, as, for example, of intracranial aneurysms or models thereof. It was suggested years ago that regional variations in aneurysmal properties could be mechanically and mechanbiologically favourable [28], but there has yet to be a detailed assessment [29]. As noted earlier, without detailed information on potentially evolving, regionally varying material properties of any tissue or organ, our understanding of both the mechanics and mechanobiology will remain limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%