2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiaxial cyclic behaviour of extruded and forged AZ80 Mg alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 4 illustrates the macroscopic morphology of the fracture surface and topological features with roughness assessment using quantitative LOM for a laboratory fatigue test specimen with geometry as per Gryguć et al [21]. This specimen was extracted from location #8 within the forged component which was free from these aforementioned macroscopic cold-shut/poor fusion defects, and then subsequently underwent fully reversed strain-controlled fatigue testing with a strain amplitude of ε A = 0.8% and failed at 568 cycles.…”
Section: Fracture Behaviour In Laboratory Test-specimens Under Fully mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 4 illustrates the macroscopic morphology of the fracture surface and topological features with roughness assessment using quantitative LOM for a laboratory fatigue test specimen with geometry as per Gryguć et al [21]. This specimen was extracted from location #8 within the forged component which was free from these aforementioned macroscopic cold-shut/poor fusion defects, and then subsequently underwent fully reversed strain-controlled fatigue testing with a strain amplitude of ε A = 0.8% and failed at 568 cycles.…”
Section: Fracture Behaviour In Laboratory Test-specimens Under Fully mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). Although the two Mg alloys are different (AZ80 vs. ZK60), their defect free fatigue properties are very similar (for the processing conditions of these two forgings which were both 300°C and a rate of 2.1 -4.2 mm/sec) [21,22,36]. The component with a lower forging defect intensity exhibited almost a 4.5x longer life than the one with a higher defect intensity.…”
Section: Fracture Behaviour In Full-scale Component Under Representatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dey et al used an elastic solution, even though they applied relatively high strain values [31]. There are also several papers where the shear stress determination method was not mentioned [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%