1993
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/39.9.1899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multianalyte assay system developed for drugs of abuse

Abstract: A simple, 10-min immunoassay system has been developed that simultaneously screens for five different classes of drugs of abuse in a urine sample. This system tests for amphetamines, cannabinoids, cocaine metabolites, opiates, and phencyclidine, and each assay has a specific preset cutoff concentration. Accuracy is > 99% for reporting positive or negative results for samples with 200% or 50%, respectively, of the cutoff concentrations of the drugs. Tests of a panel of 96 compounds yielded only three cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several recent reports describing multianalyte immunosensors. Many describe a method for multianalyte sensing but demonstrate the detection of only a single analyte. Others combine discrete sensing substrates, such as optical fibers, capillaries, microtiter wells, or dipsticks, to analyze for multiple analytes simultaneously. Another general approach employs different capture molecules in different regions of a sensing substrate and detects binding using a label-free approach. , These label-free methods continue to be susceptible to problems such as low sensitivity and increased backgrounds due to nonspecific binding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several recent reports describing multianalyte immunosensors. Many describe a method for multianalyte sensing but demonstrate the detection of only a single analyte. Others combine discrete sensing substrates, such as optical fibers, capillaries, microtiter wells, or dipsticks, to analyze for multiple analytes simultaneously. Another general approach employs different capture molecules in different regions of a sensing substrate and detects binding using a label-free approach. , These label-free methods continue to be susceptible to problems such as low sensitivity and increased backgrounds due to nonspecific binding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second strategy, proposed by Ekins and his colleagues, is based on the spatial resolution of different bioactive species on the same substrate that creates an array, permitting the detection of all the analytes through the same universal tracer. Due to the simplicity it offers, this approach seems to be well suited for the development of both multianalyte immunoassays and immunosensors. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reviews have been published on drug testing in forensic toxicology (436-439). Drugs of abuse have been detected in urine using TLC (440,441), immunoassays (442)(443)(444)(445) including EMIT (446-449), EMIT and GC/MS (450), EMIT and RIA (451, 452), SPE and HPLC with fluorescence detection (453), SPE and LC/MS (454), HPLC-DAD (455), online immunoaffinity chromatography/HPLC/MS (456), GC/MS (457), and GC/MS, TLC/GC, and EMIT (458). The Triage Panel for Drugs of Abuse has been evaluated for detection of drugs in urine (459)(460)(461).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%