2017
DOI: 10.1139/as-2016-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-year impacts of permafrost disturbance and thermal perturbation on High Arctic stream chemistry

Abstract: Permafrost disturbances (such as active layer detachment (ALD) slides) and thermal perturbation (deep ground thaw from high soil temperatures) alter Arctic surface water chemistry. However, the potential multi-year impacts on water chemistry and the ultimate recovery time are not well understood. This study evaluates the impacts on surface waters and recovery following disturbance of a High Arctic catchment in 2007 from ALDs. We measured ion concentrations and stable isotopes in surface waters collected betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Into the permafrost (below ~110 cm), ion concentrations decreased slightly until the 160‐cm depth where there were sharp increases in Cl − , SO 4 2− , Ca 2+ , and Mg 2+ . The ratio of SO 4 2− concentrations relative to all other ions increased with depth towards the permafrost table, with the highest ratios occurring in the transient layer, especially SO 4 2− :Na + , SO 4 2− :Cl − , and SO 4 2− :K + (Figure b; also reported by Lamhonwah, Lafrenière, Lamoureux, & Wolfe, ). Over the entire length of the frozen soil core (12 to 160 cm below ground), correlation coefficient calculations indicate that most ions were positively correlated with one another (>0.50), with the exceptions of SO 4 2− and Cl − (0.49), SO 4 2− and Na + (0.16), and SO 4 2− and K + (0.49; Table S2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Into the permafrost (below ~110 cm), ion concentrations decreased slightly until the 160‐cm depth where there were sharp increases in Cl − , SO 4 2− , Ca 2+ , and Mg 2+ . The ratio of SO 4 2− concentrations relative to all other ions increased with depth towards the permafrost table, with the highest ratios occurring in the transient layer, especially SO 4 2− :Na + , SO 4 2− :Cl − , and SO 4 2− :K + (Figure b; also reported by Lamhonwah, Lafrenière, Lamoureux, & Wolfe, ). Over the entire length of the frozen soil core (12 to 160 cm below ground), correlation coefficient calculations indicate that most ions were positively correlated with one another (>0.50), with the exceptions of SO 4 2− and Cl − (0.49), SO 4 2− and Na + (0.16), and SO 4 2− and K + (0.49; Table S2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It is presumed that even during summers with exceptionally high air temperatures, solute stores at these depths (below 160 cm at CBAWO) would likely remain frozen because ground ice can buffer thaw (Guodong, ; Kokelj & Burn, ). Thus, deeper solute stores buffered by ice‐rich permafrost will probably remain inaccessible to flushing unless a physical disturbance mechanism (e.g., active layer detachment slide, retrogressive thaw slump, and thermokarst activity) removes the active layer, bringing ice and solutes closer to the surface (Bowden et al, ; Kokelj et al, ; Lafrenière & Lamoureux, ; Lamhonwah et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, we suggest that the thermal observations are consistent with water inflows to the channel rather than hyporheic exchanges. Limited ground ice data from permafrost cores near Lower Goose (Figure ), collected at Cape Bounty in 2012 (Lamhonwah et al, ), suggest that the isotopic composition of ground ice is enriched relative to the West River and cannot explain the observed downstream depletion. However, more broadly, the isotopic composition of various types of ground ice across the Canadian Arctic generally have δ 18 O signatures of −26‰ to −36‰ and δD ranging between −200‰ to −255‰ (Michel, ), which could account for downstream depletion in the West River.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exponential discharge rating best fit curve was calculated as follows: Q=16.77h22.533h0.5em(),r2=0.900.5emn=42, where Q is the discharge (m 3. s −1 ) and h is the recorded stage (m) and subsequently applied to the stage depth measurements collected at the gauging station. Tributaries flowing into the West River displayed in Figure (Ptarmigan (PT), ALD05 (AL), Goose (GS), Muskox (MX)) were also gauged for the summer season using calibrated cutthroat flumes and rated with calibrated standard discharge curves (Lamhonwah, Lafrenière, Lamoureux, & Wolfe, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%