2018
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-wavelength campaign on NGC 7469

Abstract: We investigate the ionic column density variability of the ionized outflows associated with NGC 7469, to estimate their location and power. This could allow a better understanding of galactic feedback of AGNs to their host galaxies. Analysis of seven XMM-Newton grating observations from 2015 is reported. We use an individual-ion spectral fitting approach, and compare different epochs to accurately determine variability on time-scales of years, months, and days. We find no significant column density variability… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then included all the emission and absorption features (e.g due to the warm absorbers) derived from the analysis of the XMM-Newton RGS spectra of our campaign by Behar et al (2017). Since none of these components display significant variability during our campaign (Behar et al 2017;Peretz et al 2018), we keep all their parameters fixed in our following fits to the values found from the RGS data (see Behar et al 2017, for a detailed description of all the components). Some line-like features still remained in the pn spectra, and even if very weak, they result significant in terms of χ 2 , as a consequence of the high number of counts in the soft band.…”
Section: Spectral Analysis: 05-80 Kev Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then included all the emission and absorption features (e.g due to the warm absorbers) derived from the analysis of the XMM-Newton RGS spectra of our campaign by Behar et al (2017). Since none of these components display significant variability during our campaign (Behar et al 2017;Peretz et al 2018), we keep all their parameters fixed in our following fits to the values found from the RGS data (see Behar et al 2017, for a detailed description of all the components). Some line-like features still remained in the pn spectra, and even if very weak, they result significant in terms of χ 2 , as a consequence of the high number of counts in the soft band.…”
Section: Spectral Analysis: 05-80 Kev Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGC 7469 was studied also more recently: Petrucci et al (2004) investigated the UV/X-ray variability, Scott et al (2005) analysed its simultaneous X-ray, far-ultraviolet, and near-ultraviolet spectra using Chandra, FUSE and STIS, while Patrick et al (2011) studied this source taking advantage of Suzaku observations. Previous XMM-Newton data were analysed in Blustin et al (2003) and De Marco et al (2009), while some results from the 2015 observational campaign have been presented in Behar et al (2017); Peretz et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to spectral lines from the AGN wind, Fe XVII emission lines from a collisionally ionised component were also found, which is likely associated with the starburst activity of NGC 7469. Furthermore, variability in the ionic column density of the warm absorber between the individual 2015 RGS spectra are investigated in Peretz et al (2018), where lines from individual ions are independently measured. No significant changes in the ionic column densities were found among the 2015 observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…atomic and mildly ionized species (up to +3) we use the ISMAbs model (Gatuzz et al 2014). The ionized component, is modeled using our ion-by-ion fitting model -Ibifit (Peretz et al 2017). The model fits the column density of all the astrophysical abundant ions, taking into account the transitions, oscillator strengths and photoelectric edges, which were computed using the HULLAC code (Bar-Shalom et al 2001).…”
Section: Ion-by-ion Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume a discrete step-function AM D of a few temperature bins, and solve simultaneously for all ions to obtain AM D(T). The general process for solving the equations is described in Peretz et al (2017). The AM D was calculated here using the ion detections from Table 1 and not upper limits, except for O +5 that we used from the UV detection (Sembach et al 2001).…”
Section: Column Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%