2023
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13030682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Trait Selection Index for Superior Agronomic and Tuber Quality Traits in Bush Yam (Dioscorea praehensilis Benth.)

Abstract: Dioscorea praehensilis Benth. is a semi-wild yam species and a valuable source of resistance trait genes. To access the agronomic and tuber quality performance, eleven quantitative phenotypic traits were used to discriminate and identify promising accessions among 162 accessions of D. praehensilis collected in Ghana. Significant and high genetic variability (p < 0.001) for all eleven quantitative traits was found among the evaluated accessions. Moderate broad-sense heritability (H2) (30–60%) was observed fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of variance showed significant variations among the genotypes across all eight traits indicating a high level of diversity among the genotypes. A similar genetic differentiation among yam genotypes showing high coefficients of variation (CVs > 20) for agronomic and quality traits was reported by Cao et al [45], Adejumobi et al [46], and Adewumi et al [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of variance showed significant variations among the genotypes across all eight traits indicating a high level of diversity among the genotypes. A similar genetic differentiation among yam genotypes showing high coefficients of variation (CVs > 20) for agronomic and quality traits was reported by Cao et al [45], Adejumobi et al [46], and Adewumi et al [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Olivoto and Nardino [18] compared several multi-trait selection indices and proposed the novel multi-trait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI) to select genotypes with desirable mean performances across multiple traits while overcoming the limitations of traditional linear indices. The use of multiple traits in the selection of superior yam genotypes has been reported for D. rotundata wherein FAI-BLUP (multi-trait index-based factor analysis and ideotype design) [22] and MGIDI method [23] were used, while the MGIDI method was used for D. praehensilis [24] species, but none for D. alata species. In this context, an attempt was made in this study to assess a panel of D. alata mapping population progenies as well as their parents for selection of desirable genotypes/ideotypes based on their agronomic and quality characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MGIDI index efficiently selected accessions SM227, NLR33892, MTU3626, 239(3), SMB3, and 405C3 as promising candidates for direct-seeded rice improvement programs. The versatility of the MGIDI model is underscored by its successful application in assessing ideal yield and yield-related traits in various crops such as Bush Yam (Adewumi et al, 2023), Maize (Palaniyappan et al, 2023), Wheat (Meier et al, 2021), Eggplant (Uddin et al, 2021), Guar (Cymopsis tetragonoloba) (Benakanahalli et al, 2021), soybean (Woyann et al, 2019, Volpato et al, 2019. These diverse studies collectively highlight the efficiency of multivariate selection indices for simultaneous trait selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these statistical tools are insufficient to detect the weaknesses and strengths of genotypes and to select individuals with desired average performance and stability [58]. The MGIDI is a sophisticated quantitative genetic technique used to exploit desired accessions in all crop species [59] and is free from multi-collinearity problems [60]. In the current study, the MGIDI was computed for the best treatment combination (cut × space) and for the selection of suitable genotypes by grouping the studied traits into the same factor.…”
Section: Treatment Combination and Genotypes Selection Using The Mgidimentioning
confidence: 99%