2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-trait multi-environment models in the genetic selection of segregating soybean progeny

Abstract: At present, single-trait best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) is the standard method for genetic selection in soybean. However, when genetic selection is performed based on two or more genetically correlated traits and these are analyzed individually, selection bias may arise. Under these conditions, considering the correlation structure between the evaluated traits may provide more-accurate genetic estimates for the evaluated parameters, even under environmental influences. The present study was thus develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this result, it can be inferred that in the soybean breeding programs in Brazil, quantification of the effect of the interaction is of crucial importance aiming at selection of superior genotypes. The genotype × environment interaction has been widely reported for the soybean crop in Brazil (Soares et al 2015, Silva et al 2016, Volpato et al 2019 and confirms the results of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…From this result, it can be inferred that in the soybean breeding programs in Brazil, quantification of the effect of the interaction is of crucial importance aiming at selection of superior genotypes. The genotype × environment interaction has been widely reported for the soybean crop in Brazil (Soares et al 2015, Silva et al 2016, Volpato et al 2019 and confirms the results of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the case of the pedigree-based method [80], the heritability (hfalse^a2) in a narrow sense was calculated as follows:hfalse^a2=σfalse^a2σfalse^a2+σfalse^ε2 where σfalse^a2 and σfalse^ε2 correspond to the additive genetic and residual variances, respectively. In the case of Bayesian genomic prediction models (SNP/haplotypes), genomic heritability (hfalse^g2), genomic variance (σfalse^g2) and the residual variance (σfalse^ε2) were estimated using the marginal posterior distributions of each estimated parameter [81,82,83]. The genomic variance was estimated for each model as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach for computing the Bayesian accuracy was proposed by Resende et al (2012a; and applied by Volpato et al (2019) showing coherent and consistent results. The formula is given by ̂= 1 − ( )⁄ , where ( ) is the standard deviation of the estimated genetic value .…”
Section: Accuracy Comparison Between Bayesian and Fisherian Statisticmentioning
confidence: 96%