Proceedings of the 17th SIGMORPHON Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology 2020
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.sigmorphon-1.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Tiered Strictly Local Functions

Abstract: Tier-based Strictly Local functions, as they have so far been defined, are equipped with just a single tier. In light of this fact, they are currently incapable of modelling simultaneous phonological processes that would require different tiers. In this paper we consider whether and how we can allow a single function to operate over more than one tier. We conclude that multiple tiers can and should be permitted, but that the relationships between them must be restricted in some way to avoid overgeneration. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an appendix to their article, prove that the ISL functions are not closed under composition (i.e., given two ISL functions f(w) and g(w), the single function equivalent to f(g(w)) is not guaranteed to be ISL), 12 and yet the main body of their article shows that certain opaque rule interactions such as counterfeeding and counterbleeding can nevertheless be modelled using a single ISL function, suggesting that overall phonological systems might generally obey strict locality. In a The particular subclass of multi-tiered functions that Burness & McMullin (2020) argue for lets each input element separately depend on its own set of tiers, provided that the set forms a strict superset-subset hierarchy. Further work is needed, however, to assess the degree to which 12 Although Chandlee & Lindell (under review) conjecture that closure is guaranteed when neither of the functions being combined contains a "null cycle" where infinite deletion is possible.…”
Section: Limitations Of Tier-based Strictly Local Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an appendix to their article, prove that the ISL functions are not closed under composition (i.e., given two ISL functions f(w) and g(w), the single function equivalent to f(g(w)) is not guaranteed to be ISL), 12 and yet the main body of their article shows that certain opaque rule interactions such as counterfeeding and counterbleeding can nevertheless be modelled using a single ISL function, suggesting that overall phonological systems might generally obey strict locality. In a The particular subclass of multi-tiered functions that Burness & McMullin (2020) argue for lets each input element separately depend on its own set of tiers, provided that the set forms a strict superset-subset hierarchy. Further work is needed, however, to assess the degree to which 12 Although Chandlee & Lindell (under review) conjecture that closure is guaranteed when neither of the functions being combined contains a "null cycle" where infinite deletion is possible.…”
Section: Limitations Of Tier-based Strictly Local Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paradox ensues: the lowering requires a tier with only non-high vowels, while determining whether the vowel is word-final requires a tier with everything. The multi-tiered functions of Burness & McMullin (2020) seem well-suited 13 A reviewer also makes the interesting observation that the tier projection of a TSL function can only delete a segment or reproduce it exactly, precluding the ability to add information. 14 Dettweiler (2000) was unable to determine the exact meaning of of the suffix /-ni/, and so treats it as an adjective marker of uncertain status.…”
Section: Two-sided Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminarily, the answer to this question is yes – Burness & McMullin (2020) describe the strictly piecewise (SP) class of functions, an extension of the SP languages (Heinz 2009; Rogers et al . 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%