2019
DOI: 10.3390/w11122568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Temporal Variabilities of Evapotranspiration Rates and Their Associations with Climate Change and Vegetation Greening in the Gan River Basin, China

Abstract: Understanding the spatial-temporal dynamics of evapotranspiration in relation to climate change and human activities is crucial for the sustainability of water resources and ecosystem security, especially in regions strongly influenced by human impact. In this study, a process-based evapotranspiration (ET) model in conjunction with the Global Land Surface Satellite (GLASS) LAI dataset was used to characterize the spatial-temporal pattern of evapotranspiration from 1982 to 2016 over the Gan River basin (GRB), t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would therefore be interesting to look into alternative, potentially more accurate estimation methods. In addition, long-term fluctuations in the actual evaporation were observed depending on the satellite product due to the different underlying assumptions and input data (Bai et al, 2019;Feng et al, 2019;Goroshi et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2018). As shown in a previous study by and in Figure S24 in the Supplementary Material, the basin-averaged evaporation was modeled well and incorporating this flux in the calibration procedure did not improve the modeled long-term storage variabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It would therefore be interesting to look into alternative, potentially more accurate estimation methods. In addition, long-term fluctuations in the actual evaporation were observed depending on the satellite product due to the different underlying assumptions and input data (Bai et al, 2019;Feng et al, 2019;Goroshi et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2018). As shown in a previous study by and in Figure S24 in the Supplementary Material, the basin-averaged evaporation was modeled well and incorporating this flux in the calibration procedure did not improve the modeled long-term storage variabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Climate change and human activities are considered to be two major factors driving changes in the hydrological cycle [1,[26][27][28][29][30]. Climate change includes precipitation and potential evapotranspiration changes caused by temperature changes [15]; human activities include direct and indirect human activities, such as land use/cover change (LUCC) affects canopy interception, soil infiltration, land-surface evapotranspiration (ET) [31,32], and other hydrological parameters during rainfall, which in turn affect the hydrological regimes and runoff mechanisms of river basins [33,34]. Bare land, agricultural land, and settlements have lower evapotranspiration, and the greater the presence of vegetation and forest areas, the greater the evapotranspiration [31,34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies used the Penman-Monteith method to estimate crop evapotranspiration [38,39]. Although the Penman-Monteith model was used in the last two decades, Bai et al, adopted this model to estimate canopy transpiration (Ec) and soil evaporation (Es) in their new model to estimate evapotranspiration by using satellite data over a river basin in China [40].…”
Section: Crop Consumptive Usementioning
confidence: 99%