2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160500296735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐temporal analysis of MODIS data to classify sugarcane crop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
40
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This variability is illustrated by a boxplot representation of NDVI over the course of the growing season (Figure 3). Such inter-field variability has been reported by many authors, for example Xavier et al (2006), who had difficulty selecting homogeneous samples from the MODIS time series suitable for supervised classification of the cane cropped area in Brazil. However, at our study sites, climatic factors such as rain and temperature play the role of regulators, resulting in synchronization of the vegetative growth of the ratoon crops with a NDVI peak and minimal inter-field variability at the end of the rainy season (Figure 3) about two months before the harvest season (around May in Reunion, and December in Guadeloupe).…”
Section: Spatio-temporal Variability Of Sugarcane Ndvimentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This variability is illustrated by a boxplot representation of NDVI over the course of the growing season (Figure 3). Such inter-field variability has been reported by many authors, for example Xavier et al (2006), who had difficulty selecting homogeneous samples from the MODIS time series suitable for supervised classification of the cane cropped area in Brazil. However, at our study sites, climatic factors such as rain and temperature play the role of regulators, resulting in synchronization of the vegetative growth of the ratoon crops with a NDVI peak and minimal inter-field variability at the end of the rainy season (Figure 3) about two months before the harvest season (around May in Reunion, and December in Guadeloupe).…”
Section: Spatio-temporal Variability Of Sugarcane Ndvimentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Isso implicou em valores de índice de vegetação que se mantiveram abaixo de 0,2, no EVI, e de 0,3 no NDVI (Figura 2), significativamente diferente das demais classes avaliadas em ambos os índices de vegetação, nessas datas (Galford et al, 2008;Arvor et al, 2011). A cultura da cana-de-açúcar também tende a apresentar queda nos valores do EVI ao longo do período de seca (Xavier et al, 2006). No entanto, a estação seca afetou de maneira mais pronunciada as áreas de pastagem e de cerrado, em que o estresse hídrico e a ocorrência de fogo causaram queda na biomassa verde (Klink & Machado, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…In short, the Canasat sugarcane map overestimated in about 6% the sugarcane area in stratum A. Sugarcane overestimation was also observed for stratum B where the mean errors of inclusion and omission were 1%. Inclusion error in stratum B might be associated with cattle raising activity in the vicinity of sugarcane cultivated area which can cause interpretation errors, especially with well-cultivated pasture land [10,43]. In stratum C, the mean inclusion error of 2% (UAs = 98%) was compensated by the mean omission error of 2% (Pas = 98%) providing accurate area estimation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%