2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep21562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-target-qubit unconventional geometric phase gate in a multi-cavity system

Abstract: Cavity-based large scale quantum information processing (QIP) may involve multiple cavities and require performing various quantum logic operations on qubits distributed in different cavities. Geometric-phase-based quantum computing has drawn much attention recently, which offers advantages against inaccuracies and local fluctuations. In addition, multiqubit gates are particularly appealing and play important roles in QIP. We here present a simple and efficient scheme for realizing a multi-target-qubit unconve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 (a) and 6 (b), we choose the inter-cavity crosstalk coupling strengths g AB = 0.1g and g AB = 0.01g, respectively. These the coupling strength conditions are easily satisfied by the present circuit QED technology [50]. Figure 6 (a) and 6 (b) show output fidelities from the master equation simulation, which take into account the inhomogeneity in transmon-cavity interaction for the case of (i) the state |g acts as a control state and (ii) the state |f acts as a control state, respectively.…”
Section: Possible Experimental Implementationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…6 (a) and 6 (b), we choose the inter-cavity crosstalk coupling strengths g AB = 0.1g and g AB = 0.01g, respectively. These the coupling strength conditions are easily satisfied by the present circuit QED technology [50]. Figure 6 (a) and 6 (b) show output fidelities from the master equation simulation, which take into account the inhomogeneity in transmon-cavity interaction for the case of (i) the state |g acts as a control state and (ii) the state |f acts as a control state, respectively.…”
Section: Possible Experimental Implementationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Refs. [4,[30][31][32][33] discussed on how to implement a multi-target-qubit gate with natural or artificial atoms placed in or coupled to a single cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from previous works [4,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], in the following we will propose a method to implement an n-qubit controlled phase gate of n − 1 controlled qubits simultaneously controlling a single target qubit, with n qubits in n different cavities coupled to an auxiliary qutrit [ Fig. 2(a)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to efficiently implement this multiqubit gate becomes necessary and important. Over the past years, based on cavity QED or circuit QED, many efficient methods have been proposed for the direct implementation of this multiqubit phase gate, by using natural atoms or artificial atoms (e.g., superconducting qubits, quantum dots, or nitrogen-vacancy center ensembles) [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circuit QED is analogue of cavity QED, which consists of superconducting qubits and microwave resonators or cavities. It has developed fast recently and is considered as one of the most promising candidates for QIP [23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Owing to the microfabrication technology scalability, individual qubit addressability, and ever-increasing qubit coherence time [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], superconducting qubits are of great importance in QIP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%