The current study used confirmatory factor analysis techniques to investigate the construct validity of the child version of the School Refusal Assessment Scale -Revised (SRAS-R) in a community sample of low socioeconomic status, urban, African American fifth and sixth graders (n = 174). The SRAS-R is the best-researched measure of school refusal behavior in youth and typically yields four functional dimensions. Results of the investigation suggested that a modified version of the fourfactor model, in which three items from the tangible reinforcement dimension are removed, may have construct validity in the current sample of youth. In addition, youth endorsement of the dimension measuring avoidance of social and/or evaluative situations was positively associated with unexcused absences. Implications for further psychometric research and early identification and prevention of problematic absenteeism in low-SES, ethnic minority community samples are highlighted.
Keywordsschool refusal behavior; absenteeism; factor analysis; assessment; community Problematic school absenteeism is associated with a range of concurrent and future problems including dropout, delinquency, and mental illness (Alexander, Entwisle, & Horsey, 1997;Epstein & Sheldon, 2002;Loeber & Farrington, 2000;Robins & Robertson, 1996). Consistent evidence has demonstrated that even low levels of absenteeism predict increasingly severe patterns in the future (Barth, 1984;Zhang, 2003). Early identification of individuals at risk is essential to disrupt this negative trajectory. School refusal behavior (SRB), one prominent type of problematic absenteeism, has been defined as "child-motivated refusal to attend school or difficulties remaining in school for an entire day" (Kearney & Silverman, 1996; p.345). Prevalence estimates for SRB vary from 5 to 28%, depending on the operational definition of the problem and the demographics of study participants (Kearney, 2001).The importance of prevention and early intervention for youth at risk for SRB has been clearly detailed (Kearney & Hugelschofer, 2000). Within the United States, ethnic minority and lowsocioeconomic status (SES) groups are more likely to experience absenteeism than other youth (Puzzanchera, Stahl, Finnegan, Tierney, & Snyder, 2003; National Center for Education Statistics, 2006). Unfortunately, these groups are rarely selected for inclusion in SRB research and significant barriers exist to increasing their representation in the literature (Lyon & Cotler, 2007). Most notable among these barriers is that fact that no research studies to date have investigated whether existing school refusal measures are valid for youth who are at greater risk for absenteeism (i.e., low-SES, ethnic minorities), but might not yet demonstrate sufficient Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Aaron R. Lyon, University of Washington, Child Health Institute, 6200 NE 74 th St., Suite 100, Seattle, Washington 98115. lyona@u.washington.edu..
NIH Public Access
The School Refusal Assessment S...