2017
DOI: 10.1111/biom.12716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-subgroup Gene Screening Using Semi-parametric Hierarchical Mixture Models and the Optimal Discovery Procedure: Application to a Randomized Clinical Trial in Multiple Myeloma

Abstract: This article proposes an efficient approach to screening genes associated with a phenotypic variable of interest in genomic studies with subgroups. In order to capture and detect various association profiles across subgroups, we flexibly estimate the underlying effect size distribution across subgroups using a semi-parametric hierarchical mixture model for subgroup-specific summary statistics from independent subgroups. We then perform gene ranking and selection using an optimal discovery procedure based on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, SNPs that have different effect sizes between control and treatment groups would be categorized as predictive markers, while others would be categorized as prognostic markers. However, a specific criterion to categorize SNPs will be subjectively determined (see Matsui et al [6]., for example). In addition, we assessed the performance of the ODP through a simulation study based on the two clinical trials (see Section F in the Supplementary Notes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Basically, SNPs that have different effect sizes between control and treatment groups would be categorized as predictive markers, while others would be categorized as prognostic markers. However, a specific criterion to categorize SNPs will be subjectively determined (see Matsui et al [6]., for example). In addition, we assessed the performance of the ODP through a simulation study based on the two clinical trials (see Section F in the Supplementary Notes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, we used the efficient multi-subgroup gene screening method [6] (Fig. 1) developed to overcome the problem of insufficient power to detect interaction effects (see Section D in the Supplementary Notes for details).…”
Section: Multi-subgroup Gene Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When setting for feature j as a cut-off point for feature selection, we select a set Θ of features whose values are equal or greater than ( ). We evaluate a FDR based on the fitted model [20,23],…”
Section: Statistics For Feature Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop the molecular diagnostic tools, a key task is the identification of predictive biomarkers associated with subgroups of individuals who might receive beneficial or harmful effects from different available treatments (Matsui et al ., 2015; Lipkovich et al ., 2017). It is typically explained by interactions between the treatment and candidate biomarkers, but the conventional interaction tests have substantial difficulties for these analyses because of their serious limitations of statistical powers (Matsui et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%