2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2020.106537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-step molecular docking and dynamics simulation-based screening of large antiviral specific chemical libraries for identification of Nipah virus glycoprotein inhibitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data on ligand-binding sites in all three viral proteins were obtained from the published literature. The binding-site residues of protein NiV-G (Gln559, Glu579, Tyr581, Ile588) were obtained from Kalbhor et al (2021) [46], while binding-site residues of NiV-F (His29, Tyr30, Val39, Lys40, Asn380, Tyr432, Leu433) and NiV-N (Lys34, Arg36, Phe38, Val58, Ala65, Ser67, Glu124, Leu128, Ile131) were obtained from Sen et al (2019) [47]. To assess the conformational/structural differences among the ligand-binding pockets in the viral protein structures, their respective pocket volume sizes were assessed using Pocket Volume Measurer (POVME) [48] and Pymol software.…”
Section: Assessment Of Ligand-binding Pocketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data on ligand-binding sites in all three viral proteins were obtained from the published literature. The binding-site residues of protein NiV-G (Gln559, Glu579, Tyr581, Ile588) were obtained from Kalbhor et al (2021) [46], while binding-site residues of NiV-F (His29, Tyr30, Val39, Lys40, Asn380, Tyr432, Leu433) and NiV-N (Lys34, Arg36, Phe38, Val58, Ala65, Ser67, Glu124, Leu128, Ile131) were obtained from Sen et al (2019) [47]. To assess the conformational/structural differences among the ligand-binding pockets in the viral protein structures, their respective pocket volume sizes were assessed using Pocket Volume Measurer (POVME) [48] and Pymol software.…”
Section: Assessment Of Ligand-binding Pocketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data on ligand-binding sites in all three viral proteins were obtained from the published literature. The binding-site residues of protein NiV-G (Gln559, Glu579, Tyr581, Ile588) were obtained from Kalbhor et al (2021) [46]. The residues Ile588 and Tyr581 participate in hydrophobic interactions and contribute to the binding pocket that accommodates Phe120 of human EFNB2; hence, they are considered critical for inhibiting interactions by which NiV attach to EFN receptors [62].…”
Section: Volumetric Analyses Of Ligand-binding Protein Pocketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy minimized full system was set for the production run at a temperature of 300K and pressure of 1 bar. The isotherm-isobar (NPT) ensemble was selected and simulation was carried out for 100 ns [29,34,43,67].…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers discovered that the G protein is more important to Nipah infection than its fusion protein, whereas the fusion protein in Hendra is the main component of membrane attachment [ 100 ]. Molecular docking studies have been used to find common peptides that may inhibit the binding of glycoproteins on the surface of the Nipah virus [ 101 ]. Naturally occurring human antibodies have also been found to inhibit Hendra when given to infected animals [ 102 ]; interestingly, some of these monoclonal antibodies that neutralize Hendra also inhibit Nipah infection, with less reliability [ 102 ].…”
Section: Potential Prophylactic and Therapeutic Applications Of Gags In The Treatments Of Viral Zoonotic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%