2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.07.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-step Functional Process Adjustments to Reduce No-fault-found Product Failures in Service Caused by In-tolerance Faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first task is essential for the overall success of inspection planning, since all characteristics which are neglected might cause fatal damages to tools, personnel, products or customers and, on the contrary, unreasonable inspections cause inefficient test steps and increased process complexity. A common consequence of wrong characteristics identification in the planning phase is the occurrence of No-Fault-Found failures made visible during the use phase of the product [179,220,221]. These are in-tolerance failures due to unexplored interactions during the process/inspection planning phases, performed without taking into consideration process capability profiles.…”
Section: Inspection Planning In Multi-stage Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first task is essential for the overall success of inspection planning, since all characteristics which are neglected might cause fatal damages to tools, personnel, products or customers and, on the contrary, unreasonable inspections cause inefficient test steps and increased process complexity. A common consequence of wrong characteristics identification in the planning phase is the occurrence of No-Fault-Found failures made visible during the use phase of the product [179,220,221]. These are in-tolerance failures due to unexplored interactions during the process/inspection planning phases, performed without taking into consideration process capability profiles.…”
Section: Inspection Planning In Multi-stage Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis and reactive recommendations (CAPA) is a well explored area (Ding et al, 2002;Nandi et al, 2005;Jung et al, 2006;Qian et al, 2008;Bennouna and Roux, 2013;Ruiz-Mezcua et al, 2011;Prakash and Ceglarek, 2013;Pal and Ceglarek, 2013;Pal et al, 2014). For this reason, the focus of the current review is prognosis and prognostic-based decision making.…”
Section: Review Of Cbm Methods and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…breakdown). We found out that these actions can involve either the implementation of a CAPA (Qian et al, 2008;Peng et al, 2010;Ruiz-Mezcua et al, 2011;Prakash and Ceglarek, 2013;Pal and Ceglarek, 2013;Pal et al, 2014) or a change in the maintenance strategy or schedule. On the other hand, proactive recommendations are based on predictions about an undesired event (e.g.…”
Section: Proactive Decision Making Framework For Cbmmentioning
confidence: 95%