2020
DOI: 10.3390/jmse8120992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Step-Ahead Forecasting of Wave Conditions Based on a Physics-Based Machine Learning (PBML) Model for Marine Operations

Abstract: Short-term wave forecasts are essential for the execution of marine operations. In this paper, an efficient and reliable physics-based machine learning (PBML) model is proposed to realize the multi-step-ahead forecasting of wave conditions (e.g., significant wave height Hs and peak wave period Tp). In the model, the primary variables in physics-based wave models (i.e., the wind forcing and initial wave boundary condition) are considered as inputs. Meanwhile, a machine learning algorithm (artificial neural netw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, forecast skill is significantly improved. With regards to high-frequency IMFs, it is hypothesized that the inclusion of wind information may increase the accuracy of wave forecasts, as shown in past research [40][41][42]. Although this is currently outside the scope of the present work, additional research into investigating this hypothesis is of significant value to overcome the present limitations of the EMD-LSTM model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As a result, forecast skill is significantly improved. With regards to high-frequency IMFs, it is hypothesized that the inclusion of wind information may increase the accuracy of wave forecasts, as shown in past research [40][41][42]. Although this is currently outside the scope of the present work, additional research into investigating this hypothesis is of significant value to overcome the present limitations of the EMD-LSTM model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The interesting thing to note here is that while the performance of ET continues to decrease till 24 hours, the performance of LightGBM does not decrease similarly. From Figures (6)(7)(8)(9) and Table 3, we observe that the performance of the machine learning algorithms decreases as the time steps for forecasting increase. Specifically, for both algorithms, Coefficient Correlation, Variance, Adjusted R2 decrease rapidly for predictions till 15 hours but decrease slowly afterward.…”
Section: Short Term Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus, every 3 hourly predictions add 6 steps to our proposed method. Figures (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9), Table 3, and Table 4 show the performance of LightGBM and ET for predictions up to 24 hours ahead in 3-hour intervals. In Figures (2)(3)(4)(5) and Table 2, we can see that the performance of Extra Trees decreases rapidly from 0 to 3 hours but then decreases slowly for MAE, RMSE, HH, and SI.…”
Section: Short Term Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations