2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.07.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Station Multi-Axis Hybrid Layered Manufacturing (MSMA-HLM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13d). Finally, for the first time, Karunakaran et al [114] and Gupta et al [115] integrated an interlayer cold hammering/peening system into a hybrid 3D printing machine (DED cell-laser, GTA, and GMA-and machining setup). These authors noted that hammering/peening/forging could be directly integrated into the manufacturing setup without altering it significantly; i.e., they did not need a specific manufacturing setup.…”
Section: Hammering Peening and Forgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13d). Finally, for the first time, Karunakaran et al [114] and Gupta et al [115] integrated an interlayer cold hammering/peening system into a hybrid 3D printing machine (DED cell-laser, GTA, and GMA-and machining setup). These authors noted that hammering/peening/forging could be directly integrated into the manufacturing setup without altering it significantly; i.e., they did not need a specific manufacturing setup.…”
Section: Hammering Peening and Forgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great advantage of the hammer/peening/forging is their ability to be coupled to a robot arm or CNC machine, allowing almost unrestricted path planning and deposition strategy selection [97]. Therefore, considering the ability to be coupled to a robotic arm, the proven effect on the microstructure refinement and the improvement in the quasi-static mechanical properties, and the previous practical knowledge and performance in arc-welding, the interlayer hammer/peening/forging processes show better industrial scalability indicators, as indicated by Karunakaran et al [114] and Gupta et al [115].…”
Section: Summary and Outlooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extensive research has been carried out on multi-axis machinery [33], methodologies and sequencing [34,35], part quality and error avoidance [36] during HM of metallic parts and multi-axis AM of various materials [37,38], very limited references can be found related to the HM of non-metallic parts. Li, Haghidhi and Yang [39] have developed and tested a multi-axis robot methodology for the HM of polymer parts, showing that it reduces production time, that parts demonstrate better surface quality after removing the staircase error, that it manufactures high quality freeform surfaces through dynamic adjustment of the tool axis direction and that it eliminates the need for support structures because of multi-axis flexibility.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%