2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-stage consistency optimization algorithm for decision making with incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(200 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the amount of complete and used blockchain is too large, in this paper, we build a blockchain that takes Taifang's private chain as a prototype system to store tracking information. is paper will implement and verify the license chain P2P network [19] and consistency algorithm designed [20]. e license chain of the prototype system is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Implementation Of License Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the amount of complete and used blockchain is too large, in this paper, we build a blockchain that takes Taifang's private chain as a prototype system to store tracking information. is paper will implement and verify the license chain P2P network [19] and consistency algorithm designed [20]. e license chain of the prototype system is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Implementation Of License Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the performance of alternatives under some criteria is too complex for experts to give a clear evaluation [14,15]. At this time, pairwise comparison between alternatives is a good choice for decision makers to express preference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, pairwise comparison between alternatives is a good choice for decision makers to express preference. Probabilistic linguistic preference relation (PLPR) [14] is the most prominent one among all linguistic preference relations [15], which expresses experts' preference for one alternative over another through PLTSs. PLTSs can fully represent the information of decision makers, which allows decision makers to select multiple linguistic terms and give corresponding probabilities to express importance [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, in terms of qualitative evaluation, the linguistic variables (LVs) introduced by Zadeh [9] promote the convenient expression of qualitative information, which is more in line with human evaluation habits. Then, some scholars point out that a single linguistic term (LT) is not enough to accurately model the qualitative evaluation information, so some extended linguistic information forms begin to emerge, such as two-dimensional linguistic variables (2DLVs) [10], hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets [11], probabilistic linguistic term sets [12,13], and so on. However, it is worth noting that in the real complex decision-making environment, if people want to describe some uncertain information more accurately and completely, it is necessary to consider both qualitative and quantitative expressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%