2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-spectral low-rank structured dictionary learning for face recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compared methods have the same compressive sampling scheme, which is based on the coded aperture snapshot spectral imaging system [10] and utilises the Bernoulli random matrix as the sensing matrix. The main difference among the compared methods lies in the sparse recovery, where the wavelet [10], the feature representation base [13], the cluster sparsity field [28], the inter‐spectral multi‐layered conditional random field [29], and multi‐spectral low‐rank structured dictionary learning [30] are utilised as the representation bases, respectively, in the framework of compressive sensing. In the following, the compared methods are named ‘Wavelet’, ‘FR’, ‘CSF’, ‘IS‐MCF’, and ‘MLSDL’, respectively, for short.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compared methods have the same compressive sampling scheme, which is based on the coded aperture snapshot spectral imaging system [10] and utilises the Bernoulli random matrix as the sensing matrix. The main difference among the compared methods lies in the sparse recovery, where the wavelet [10], the feature representation base [13], the cluster sparsity field [28], the inter‐spectral multi‐layered conditional random field [29], and multi‐spectral low‐rank structured dictionary learning [30] are utilised as the representation bases, respectively, in the framework of compressive sensing. In the following, the compared methods are named ‘Wavelet’, ‘FR’, ‘CSF’, ‘IS‐MCF’, and ‘MLSDL’, respectively, for short.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In table 5, we have highlighted the results of their technique against image-set classification algorithms and Grayscale and RGB FR algorithms. Jing et al [52] use multi-view dictionary learning method for classification and apply it to all three datasets with different levels of corruption added to the pixels. We note the results for 0 pixel corruptions in Table 5.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Methods On Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multispectral Low Rank Structured dictionary learning for face recognition [65] suggests real time applications, during acquisition of multi spectra images, high level of noise may corrupt the multi spectral image which can degrade the recognition rate. To improve the performance of multispectral images corrupted with noise, a novel approach called MSDL is used.…”
Section: Hyperspectral Face Recognition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%