2021
DOI: 10.1111/maec.12669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi‐species fish foraging associations during tool use by the graphic tuskfish Choerodon graphicus (De Vis 1885) (Labridae)

Abstract: Multi‐species foraging associations occur when one or more species forage together. However, these associations have not yet been studied during tool use in fishes. Observations were made of the graphic tuskfish Choerodon graphicus (De Vis 1885) in New Caledonia to determine whether other fishes attended it during tool‐use events. A new subtype of attendant associations, "scavenging at anvil", formed during 15 of 16 tool‐use events (94%). Six identifiable attendant families were observed: Acanthuridae (surgeon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observations of fishes attending foraging C. graphicus at Île aux Canards (Videos S3 and S4) contrast with our previous observations of no fishes attending foraging C. graphicus at Îlot Maître (Video S6; Pryor & Milton, 2021). This newfound inclusion of attendants during foraging at Île aux Canards was probably because attendants had greater opportunity to notice and respond to visual cues such as body movements and auditory cues such as the sound of coral pieces scraping against other coral pieces (Fricke, 1975;Krajewski, 2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our observations of fishes attending foraging C. graphicus at Île aux Canards (Videos S3 and S4) contrast with our previous observations of no fishes attending foraging C. graphicus at Îlot Maître (Video S6; Pryor & Milton, 2021). This newfound inclusion of attendants during foraging at Île aux Canards was probably because attendants had greater opportunity to notice and respond to visual cues such as body movements and auditory cues such as the sound of coral pieces scraping against other coral pieces (Fricke, 1975;Krajewski, 2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…C. graphicus is solitary and forages on rubble and sandy bottoms in lagoons and seaward reefs (Lieske & Myers, 1994) in search of three main prey types: crustaceans, molluscs and sea urchins (Bray, 2023;Westneat, 2001). Some individuals break open molluscs on anvils and usually attract attendants when doing so (Pryor & Milton, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the use of colour change by fishes themselves to signal the availability of food has not been documented. While co‐operation in animal social groups is often reported to be within species (Torney et al, 2011), there are multiple reports of multispecies feeding aggregations (Krajewski et al, 2006; Pryor & Milton, 2021; Sazima et al, 2006) and evidence that fish use referential gestures to form collaborations with other species of fish and invertebrates (Vail et al, 2013). Furthermore, we have seen that some species of goatfish use colour change in mutualistic cleaning interactions with cleaner shrimp ( Ancylomenes pedersoni ) on a Caribbean Reef (Caves, Green, & Johnsen, 2018), demonstrating that goatfish do use colour change for interspecific signalling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be expected to have more impact on a prey species if the tool-using wrasse specialised in it. Tool use may also benefit opportunistic attendant species via the incidental provision of prey (Pryor & Milton, 2021) (Choat, 1982;Coyer, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%