2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1004-4132(07)60070-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-sources information fusion algorithm in airborne detection systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with the existing methods [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the proposed method in this paper considers sufficiently the risk attitude of DM, and determines the attributes weights by min-max optimization model, while in [6] the attributes weights are artificially given, and [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] did not consider the risk preference of DM. In addition, the data of the characteristic value and observations of sensors are all exact real numbers in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], whereas this paper deals with the triangular fuzzy number, which is the most difference between the existing literature and this paper.…”
Section: Simulation Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In comparison with the existing methods [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the proposed method in this paper considers sufficiently the risk attitude of DM, and determines the attributes weights by min-max optimization model, while in [6] the attributes weights are artificially given, and [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] did not consider the risk preference of DM. In addition, the data of the characteristic value and observations of sensors are all exact real numbers in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], whereas this paper deals with the triangular fuzzy number, which is the most difference between the existing literature and this paper.…”
Section: Simulation Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, the data of the characteristic value and observations of sensors are all exact real numbers in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], whereas this paper deals with the triangular fuzzy number, which is the most difference between the existing literature and this paper. The above discussion shows the efficiency of the developed theoretic results of this paper to some extent.…”
Section: Simulation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many different fusion methods for multi-sensor object recognition have been developed [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], e.g., methods based on Shafer-Dempster evidence theory [2][3][4][5], methods based on fuzzy theory [6][7][8][9][10][11], and Bayesian approach [12], etc. While these fusion methods all work well when the sensor readings may be described by real (precise) numbers, the methods based on Shafer-Dempster evidence and fuzzy theories excessively depend on the selection of basic probability assignment and the membership function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There already have been many authors proposed target recognition methods, which are also well known in multiattribute decision field. For example, Dempster-Shafer evidence theory method [3][4][5][6], fuzzy-Bayesian approach [7], vague set method [8][9][10], variable fuzzy set method [11], extension method [12], VIKOR method [13] and entropy weights method [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%