2021
DOI: 10.3390/mti5030012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Session Influence of Two Modalities of Feedback and Their Order of Presentation on MI-BCI User Training

Abstract: By performing motor-imagery tasks, for example, imagining hand movements, Motor-Imagery based Brain-Computer Interfaces (MI-BCIs) users can control digital technologies, for example, neuroprosthesis, using their brain activity only. MI-BCI users need to train, usually using a unimodal visual feedback, to produce brain activity patterns that are recognizable by the system. The literature indicates that multimodal vibrotactile and visual feedback is more effective than unimodal visual feedback, at least for shor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the next trial (Carabalona and Castiglioni, 2009); for example, motivation is impacted by feedback (Alimardani et al, 2014;Pillette et al, 2021). Despite the inter-trial interval that was randomized between 0.5 and 2.5 s, this effect might still be prevalent.…”
Section: The Impact Of Resting-state Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the next trial (Carabalona and Castiglioni, 2009); for example, motivation is impacted by feedback (Alimardani et al, 2014;Pillette et al, 2021). Despite the inter-trial interval that was randomized between 0.5 and 2.5 s, this effect might still be prevalent.…”
Section: The Impact Of Resting-state Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies made a point about the reliability of these tools. Pillette’s study did not find any influence of the initial KVIQ scores on MI performances ( Pillette et al, 2021 ). Concerning MIQ-RS, no significant correlation was found between the scores and the BCI performance in healthy subjects ( Rimbert et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Future perspectives may combine other types of feedback. An example can be visual feedback with a vibrotactile one, as in Leeb et al (2013) , Jeunet et al (2015b) , and Pillette et al (2021) , yet, it has to be tested in the stroke population. This type of feedback has proven to liberate the visual channel so that subjects can pay attention to other events such as distractors ( Leeb et al, 2013 ; Jeunet et al, 2015b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixteen MT-BCI naïve participants were included in this study (aged 22.31 ± 2.33) [23]. EEG signals were recorded using 11 scalp electrodes (FC4, C4, CP4, C6, FC3, C3, CP3, C5, C1, Cz, C2, 10-20 system).…”
Section: ) Data Set 2: Motor Imagery-execution Tasks (Mie) Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%