2013
DOI: 10.5772/55808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Sensor Localization and Navigation for Remote Manipulation in Smoky Areas

Abstract: When localizing mobile sensors and actuators in indoor environments laser meters, ultrasonic meters or even image processing techniques are usually used. On the other hand, in smoky conditions, due to a fire or building collapse, once the smoke or dust density grows, optical methods are not efficient anymore. In these scenarios other type of sensors must be used, such as sonar, radar or radiofrequency signals. Indoor localization in low-visibility conditions due to smoke is one of the EU GUARDIANS [1] project … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As future work, we are planning to integrate the recently proposed indoor radio-based localization system [38] into the shopping cart. This system is based on fingerprinting techniques and can be applied to robot and person localization in order to know their position in a particular environment [39], just using simply the WiFi/ZigBee transceiver information, and providing a 1.5 m localization error. This could improve the robot navigation inside a shopping center, and the robot could also show the person where to go in order to find a particular product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As future work, we are planning to integrate the recently proposed indoor radio-based localization system [38] into the shopping cart. This system is based on fingerprinting techniques and can be applied to robot and person localization in order to know their position in a particular environment [39], just using simply the WiFi/ZigBee transceiver information, and providing a 1.5 m localization error. This could improve the robot navigation inside a shopping center, and the robot could also show the person where to go in order to find a particular product.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some dust points (false negatives) remained. Marti et al [11] addressed mobile robot navigation in smoky areas by using visual artificial landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LED patterns have been previously used by the authors in the context of localization of mobile robots in low-visibility conditions [33,34]. The use of high intensity LEDs improve the detection of the markers using optical sensors like cameras, where visibility is not optimal, like in smoke-filled environments or underwater in presence of water turbidity.…”
Section: Visually-guided Algorithm To Control a Robotic Armmentioning
confidence: 99%