LatinX in AI at Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference 2023 2023
DOI: 10.52591/lxai2023061813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Scale Structural-aware Exposure Correction for Endoscopic Imaging

Ricardo Espinosa,
Axel Garcia-Vega,
Gilberto Ochoa-Ruiz

Abstract: Endoscopy is the most widely imaging technique used for the diagnosis of cancerous lesions in hollow organs. However, endoscopic images are often affected by illumination artefacts: image parts may be over- or underexposed according to the light source pose and the tissue orientation. These artifacts have a strong negative impact on the performance of computer vision or artificial intelligence based diagnosis tools. Although endoscopic image enhancement methods are greatly required, little effort has been devo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coarse-to-fine deep network [21] for exposure correction achieved PSNR and SSIM scores of 22.28 and 0.772 [33] on the overexposed and 23.06 and 0.760 on the underexposed images of the Endo4IE dataset. Espinosa et al [33] improved the method by adding an SSIM loss module into the model and improved the results to SSIM scores of 0.806 and 0.792 for over and underexposed images. The superior results were obtained by Mou et al [22].…”
Section: Comparisons On the Endo4ie Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coarse-to-fine deep network [21] for exposure correction achieved PSNR and SSIM scores of 22.28 and 0.772 [33] on the overexposed and 23.06 and 0.760 on the underexposed images of the Endo4IE dataset. Espinosa et al [33] improved the method by adding an SSIM loss module into the model and improved the results to SSIM scores of 0.806 and 0.792 for over and underexposed images. The superior results were obtained by Mou et al [22].…”
Section: Comparisons On the Endo4ie Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%