2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.19.440501
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale semi-supervised clustering of brain images: deriving disease subtypes

Abstract: Disease heterogeneity is a significant obstacle to understanding pathological processes and delivering precision diagnostics and treatment. Clustering methods have gained popularity in stratifying patients into subpopulations (i.e., subtypes) of brain diseases using imaging data. However, unsupervised clustering approaches are often confounded by anatomical and functional variations not related to a disease or pathology of interest. Semi-supervised clustering techniques have been proposed to overcome this and,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(202 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The family of DNMF methods capture discriminant representation by minimizing and maximizing within-class and among-class variations respectively, thus did not capture heterogeneity within the PT class accurately either. Designed for parsing disease heterogeneity, semi-supervised methods focused on clustering patients into hard categorical subtypes (Varol et al (2016), Dong et al (2015), Wen et al (2021), Yang et al (2021)). With different end points, these methods (including Smile-GAN) can not be directly compared with Surreal-GAN.…”
Section: Results On Semi-synthetic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The family of DNMF methods capture discriminant representation by minimizing and maximizing within-class and among-class variations respectively, thus did not capture heterogeneity within the PT class accurately either. Designed for parsing disease heterogeneity, semi-supervised methods focused on clustering patients into hard categorical subtypes (Varol et al (2016), Dong et al (2015), Wen et al (2021), Yang et al (2021)). With different end points, these methods (including Smile-GAN) can not be directly compared with Surreal-GAN.…”
Section: Results On Semi-synthetic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, both methods applied directly in the PT domain, confront main limitations in avoiding potential disease-unrelated brain variations. In contrast, semi-supervised clustering methods (Varol et al (2016), Dong et al (2015), Wen et al (2021), Yang et al (2021)) were proposed to cluster patients via the patterns or transformations between the reference group (CN) and the target patient group (PT). A recent proposed deep learning-based semi-supervised clustering method, termed Smile-GAN (Yang et al (2021)), achieved better clustering performance by learning multiple mappings from CN to PT with an inverse clustering function for both regularization and clustering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surreal-GAN 3 dissects underlying disease-related heterogeneity via a deep representation learning approach under the principle of semi-supervised clustering. Semi-supervised clustering 1,31 seeks the “ 1-to-k ” mapping between the reference healthy control group and the patient group, thereby teasing out clusters or subtypes driven by different pathological trajectories instead of global similarity/dissimilarity in data. Refer to Supplementary eMethod 1 ’s schematic figure for the intuition of deep semi-supervised learning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, AI has been applied to MRI to disentangle the neuroanatomical heterogeneity of AD with categorical disease subtypes. 1,2,31 The genetic underpinnings 32,33 of this neuroanatomical heterogeneity in AD are also complex and heterogeneous. The most recent large-scale genome-wide association study 32 (GWAS: 111,326 AD vs. 677,633 controls) has identified 75 genomic loci, including APOE genes, associated with AD.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%