2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-016-3653-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale score level fusion of local descriptors for gender classification in the wild

Abstract: The 2015 FRVT gender classification (GC) report evidences the problems that current approaches tackle in situations with large variations in pose, illumination, background and facial expression. The report suggests that both commercial and research solutions are hardly able to reach an accuracy over 90% for The Images of Groups dataset, a proven scenario exhibiting unrestricted or in the wild conditions. In this paper, we focus on this challenging dataset, stepping forward in GC performance by observing: 1) re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(71 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, a subset of descriptors is used to combine their decisions. According to our previous experience, the combination of descriptors has proven to be of interest in gender classification reducing both error and ambiguous cases [19], [20]. This evidence has also been argued by other authors in different applications.…”
Section: Classificationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Later, a subset of descriptors is used to combine their decisions. According to our previous experience, the combination of descriptors has proven to be of interest in gender classification reducing both error and ambiguous cases [19], [20]. This evidence has also been argued by other authors in different applications.…”
Section: Classificationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In general, the data of a single modality lack uniqueness and non-universality and also comprise noise [49]. Therefore, multi-modal data obtained by the fusion of single modalities have better discrimination abilities and are used in various applications [50,51]. The fusion of the information can usually be performed at three levels: (a) feature-extraction level, (b) matching-score level, and (c) decision level.…”
Section: Final Classification Of Mitotic Cells Via Score-level Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fused vector of match scores is treated as a feature vector which is then classified into one of two classes: 'genuine user' or 'impostor'. Various classifiers used for this purpose are support vector machine (SVM) [24,25] and its variants, Fisher linear discriminant analysis, the Bayesian classifier (beta distribution), multi-layer perceptron and decision tree [25], hidden Markov model (HMM) [26] etc. Artabaz et al [27] combined different primitive score-level fusion rules using a genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%