2022
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2022.2090891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale politics in climate change: the mismatch of authority and capability in federalizing Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there is a discrepancy between the authorities granted and the institutional capabilities and capacities of provincial and local governments to implement the policies and plans [ 87 ]. The 2015 Constitution of Nepal establishes a framework for intergovernmental relations that allows the federal government to guide or assist local governments directly or through provincial governments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is a discrepancy between the authorities granted and the institutional capabilities and capacities of provincial and local governments to implement the policies and plans [ 87 ]. The 2015 Constitution of Nepal establishes a framework for intergovernmental relations that allows the federal government to guide or assist local governments directly or through provincial governments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While federalism, as now stipulated in the Nepalese constitution, has raised expectations and trust among citizens, local governments have faced criticism for their inefficiency in areas including social welfare, public service delivery, employment creation, and good governance (Chaudhary, 2019). Many local governments have focused on securing narrow political interests deeply connected to bureaucracy and trade unions rather than expending significant energy on providing quality public services (Acharya & Scott, 2022), and are performing poorly in areas such as regional resource allocation and management of competitive public demands (Khatri et al., 2022). According to Acharya and Scott (2022)ʼs interview with public officials and politicians, local governments in Nepal lag behind in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the newly promulgated Nepalese Constitution adopting federalism in 2015 allows for three levels of government—federal, provincial, and local, and has granted unprecedented powers, roles, and resources to the sub‐national governments (Bhusal & Breen, 2023). At these local government levels, authorities exercise significant powers such as formulating and implementing new laws and policies, preparing and executing annual budgets, among others (Khatri et al., 2022). The rationale behind empowering local levels such as metropolitan cities and municipalities with such strong authority has been to expand the opportunities for citizen participation, induce democratic practices, reduce administrative costs, enhance efficiency, foster fair competition, and politically empower citizens (Acharya & Zafarullah, 2020; Bhusal & Breen, 2023).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the establishment of the federal structure has opened a way to devolve authority to local governments, studies have highlighted there is a lack of institutional capability to undertake the roles entrusted to them (Khatri et al, 2022). Consequently, the governing institutions at multiple scales lack the ability to regulate haphazard urbanisation and associated risk production.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban governance, particularly in the newly declared urban areas, frequently lack institutional capacity, illustrated by a lack of authority, knowledge and access to resources (Khatri et al, 2022), particularly in relation to the disaster preparedness, exposing dwellers to multi-hazard risks (Aryal, 2014). Additionally, the exposure to multi-hazard risk and effects of disasters on residents vary based on class, caste/ethnicity, gender which is co-shaped by social stigma and uneven capabilities to access and influence the disaster management policies and praxis in the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%