2012
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2011.649864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale object-based image analysis and feature selection of multi-sensor earth observation imagery using random forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
6
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the performance of a combination of RF approaches with object-based image analysis for crop mapping has garnered much attention [25,41,42]. However, few studies have paid much attention to producing the early seasonal crop type maps for decision-maker management and mapping crop seasonal dynamics based on new "two high resolution" satellite data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the performance of a combination of RF approaches with object-based image analysis for crop mapping has garnered much attention [25,41,42]. However, few studies have paid much attention to producing the early seasonal crop type maps for decision-maker management and mapping crop seasonal dynamics based on new "two high resolution" satellite data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the selected application, the underlying input imagery, and the environment under analysis, objects of different sizes that depict different land surface features can be produced. OBIA can derive additional geometry and contextual semantic features that are potentially useful for classification studies [49]. Optical images evaluated with OBIA have been increasingly used for landslide inventory mapping, effectively detecting unvegetated landslides [9,22,28,[50][51][52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANN, support vector machine). Despite of these reservations, the MLC is still extensively applied in some studies aiming at comparison of various classifiers (Duro et al, 2012). On the contrary, Platt and Rapoza (2008) demonstrated that ML classifier exceeds the accuracy of the k-NN classification in pixel-based comparisons where the feature space (i.e.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class mean vector and the covariance matrix are the fundamental sources for the function and can be estimated from the training pixels of a specific class (Asmala, 2012). The ML classification has commonly been assumed as unsuited to the classification of data types that can disturb various assumptions of parametric statistical techniques, such as categorical or non-Gaussian distribution of data sets (Duro et al, 2012). The ML algorithm tends to be not as much effective in the overall classification accuracy as modern non-parametric machine learning classifiers (e.g.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%