The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Scale Geometric Consistency Guided Multi-View Stereo

Abstract: In this paper, we propose an efficient multi-scale geometric consistency guided multi-view stereo method for accurate and complete depth map estimation. We first present our basic multi-view stereo method with Adaptive Checkerboard sampling and Multi-Hypothesis joint view selection (ACMH). It leverages structured region information to sample better candidate hypotheses for propagation and infer the aggregation view subset at each pixel. For the depth estimation of low-textured areas, we further propose to comb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
206
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
206
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, Liu et al [21] improved the metric by using Gaussian filtering to counteract the effect of noise. COLMAP [22] and some following works [23], [24] handled this problem by dataset-wide pixel-wise view selection using patch color distribution. Our network learns to predict the pixel-wise visibility for all the given source views and use the prediction in multi-view feature aggregation, which can be trained end-to-end and improve the robustness to occlusions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Liu et al [21] improved the metric by using Gaussian filtering to counteract the effect of noise. COLMAP [22] and some following works [23], [24] handled this problem by dataset-wide pixel-wise view selection using patch color distribution. Our network learns to predict the pixel-wise visibility for all the given source views and use the prediction in multi-view feature aggregation, which can be trained end-to-end and improve the robustness to occlusions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Galliani, Lasinger, and Schindler 2015) utilizes a diffusion-like propagation scheme to make better use of the parallelization of GPUs. By inheriting the checkerboard pattern of (Galliani, Lasinger, and Schindler 2015), ACMH (Xu and Tao 2019) designs an adaptive checkerboard sampling strategy to propagate more reliable hypotheses. Moreover, ACMH further exploits these hypotheses to infer pixelwise view selection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the difficulty in solving such optimization problems, the efficiency of these methods is low and they are easy to be trapped in local optima. Recently, PatchMatch multi-view stereo methods (Zheng et al 2014;Galliani, Lasinger, and Schindler 2015;Schönberger et al 2016;Xu and Tao 2019) become popular as their used PatchMatch-based optimization (Barnes et al 2009) makes depth map estimation efficient and accurate. As these methods do not explicitly model the planar priors, these methods still encounter the failure in low-textured areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patch model is essentially a local tangent plane approximation of a surface. Algorithms proposed by References 4,13,14,16,17,26,27 utilize a pixel window in the reference view to represent the projection of a small planar patch in the scene and conduct a region‐growing procedure to generate dense correspondences and depth maps. Methods like 9‐12,28 directly encode the patch model as a rectangle in three‐dimension space which is oriented and one of its edges is parallel to the x ‐axis of the reference camera.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%