2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale deformable transformer for multi-contrast knee MRI super-resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of DL for MRI reconstructions has the potential to reduce the examination time for TSE and FLAIR acquisitions. In recent years, a number of different approaches to deep learning (DL) have emerged, and a growing number of new developments in artificial networks have initiated a paradigm shift in the field of medical imaging [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of DL for MRI reconstructions has the potential to reduce the examination time for TSE and FLAIR acquisitions. In recent years, a number of different approaches to deep learning (DL) have emerged, and a growing number of new developments in artificial networks have initiated a paradigm shift in the field of medical imaging [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model is trained using the Adam optimizer for 50 epochs, and a learning rate is set to 1e-5. For the FastMRI dataset, the evaluation index values of all comparison methods are obtained from MSDT (Zou et al 2023). For AXA dataset, the indicators of MSDT are obtained by direct testing it, and the other comparison methods are retrained and tested to obtain the corresponding indicators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the PSNR and SSIM values, the better the performance of the method. In order to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method, we objectively compare it with some state-of-the-art methods, including EDSR (Lim et al 2017), MCSR (Zeng et al 2018), NEU (Neubert et al 2020), MINet (Feng et al 2021a) and MSDT (Zou et al 2023), and the results obtained by the comparison method are all from the official specifications. Table 1 and Table 2 show the average measure results of 2× and 4× SR reconstruction on the FastMRI and AXA datasets for all comparison methods.…”
Section: Objective and Subjective Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI predominates in radiogenomics for breast imaging [ 91 ] and has been found to be the most accurate test for finding BC [ 92 , 93 , 94 ]. Yamamoto et al looked at 10 patients who had preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and global gene expression data [ 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 ]. The relationship between MRI phenotypes and underlying global BC gene expression patterns was presented using a preliminary radiogenomic association map.…”
Section: Current Application Of Radiogenomics In Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, known as co-learning, links a modality with abundant resources to one with limited resources, enhancing inference capabilities in the latter through the relevant modality [ 96 ]. Multi-modal analysis has found application across diverse domains including geographical and biomedical image analysis [ 97 , 98 ], video analysis [ 99 , 100 ], and sentiment analysis [ 101 ]. Various methods facilitate co-learning in multi-modal analysis, such as tensor learning [ 102 ], generative models [ 103 ], graphical models [ 104 , 105 ], prior knowledge regularization [ 106 ], multiple kernel learning [ 107 ], and neural networks [ 108 , 109 , 110 ].…”
Section: Current Application Of Radiogenomics In Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%