2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale crystal growth computations via an approximate block Newton method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that this one-way coupling approach is still approximate, since it oversimplifies the heat load of the ampoule on the furnace. We have developed a rigorous method for model coupling (see [35,36]), but this approach is currently limited to steady-state computations thus was not employed for the results presented in this paper.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that this one-way coupling approach is still approximate, since it oversimplifies the heat load of the ampoule on the furnace. We have developed a rigorous method for model coupling (see [35,36]), but this approach is currently limited to steady-state computations thus was not employed for the results presented in this paper.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this report we will restrict the type of growth to vertical Bridgman growth, also termed vertical gradient freeze (VGF) or low-pressure Bridgman growth, although these modeling methods can be applied to other common growth geometries, such as traveling heater methods (THM) with little changes. At the level of the growth furnace and the melt crucible and treating the solid and liquid as continuum objects with specified physical and mechanical properties there are several key references regarding advances made in models and modeling approaches [7][8][9][10]. The main technical achievement in these models is the ability to accurately model the physics of CdTe and CZT in terms of heat transfer, including optical transparency, and to be able to couple two modeling scales in a selfconsistent manner.…”
Section: Overview Of Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational modeling regimes are divided into 6 levels that all have appeared in the crystal growth modeling literature as either separate or coupled regimes. 1) The Level 1 model is a furnace-level global model of heat transfer, fluid flow, and radiative heating have been solved and/or could be solved for any particular furnace system to a high level of thermal accuracy [7] as indicated in Figure 2 below. 2) Embedded in this Level 1 model is a Level 2 model that is more local.…”
Section: Outline Of Approach To Address the Computational Modeling Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations